The Hong Kong Academy of Performing Arts - APA vs Universidad EIA vs ESG Ecoles de Commerce vs Moi University vs University of Eastern Africa Baraton

Side-by-side comparison from 112 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Eastern Africa Baraton (4.60)
The Hong Kong Academy of Performing Arts - APA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad EIA: wins 0/7 categories
ESG Ecoles de Commerce: wins 0/7 categories
Moi University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Eastern Africa Baraton: wins 2/7 categories
Universidade Estadual de Londrina: wins 5/7 categories
FH Schmalkalden University of Applied Sciences - SUAS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Antioquia, Colombia
4.30
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Physics
Aix en Provence, France
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
eldoret, Kenya
4.00
Read more reviews
88 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.78
3.67
3.92
3.86
4.00
Win
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.80
4.00
3.93
4.57
Win
4.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.60
4.67
4.24
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.90
3.67
3.75
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.78
3.00
4.05
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.90
4.00
4.16
4.71
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.20
3.00
3.68
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent, prepared, and supportive professors.
  • +Strong focus on engineering academics and innovation.
  • +Pleasant campus environment conducive to learning.
  • +Modern campus with diverse programs and extracurricular activities
  • +Attentive and available staff
  • +Practical training and professional opportunities
  • +Dedicated lecturers and strong academic foundation
  • +Diverse student body and vibrant campus life
  • +Hands-on training and research opportunities
  • +Strong faith-based values and spiritual focus
  • +Comprehensive skill development beyond academics
  • +Quality education and competent lecturers
  • +Inclusive and diverse student community
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +High-quality and relevant academic programs

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from administrative staff create frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in need of repair.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as irrelevant or not keeping pace with industry standards.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
  • -A lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a common complaint.
  • -Frequent strikes disrupt academic activities and extend graduation timelines.
  • -Administrative issues include delayed payment of staff, fund embezzlement, and missing marks that hinder graduation.
  • -Outdated and poor infrastructure, coupled with overpopulation, negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support was a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Across surveyed aspects, the university demonstrates particularly strong performance regarding **Professors**, earning a high rating of 4.6. Accommodation also scores well at 4.2. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** show the lowest scores, both at approximately 3.78. Ratings for Location, Internationality, and Value are consistent and fall in the mid-to-high 3.0 range.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both earning perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. The university performs well in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, each receiving a solid 4. While **Value** is also strong at 4.5, these three areas represent the relative lowest scores in its otherwise impressive profile.

Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects. Professors and value emerge as the strongest areas, boasting the highest scores. Accommodation is the weakest point, with the lowest rating. Other categories like facilities, location, student life, and internationality are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though not reaching the exceptional levels of the top-performing areas.

The university demonstrates a very strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.71. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** also received exceptionally high marks, all scoring 4.57. Student life is rated well at 4.29, and accommodation is also solid at 4.0. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Facilities**, rated at 3.86.

This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 12 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent professors and academic focus, particularly in engineering, alongside a pleasant campus. There are very few negative comments.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting a modern campus with numerous activities and an attentive staff. Students also appreciate the diversified, practice-oriented programs with multiple sector choices.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, dedicated lecturers, and a diverse student body. A small percentage (~5.7%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiencies and occasional missing marks.

University of Eastern Africa, Baraton receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise its Christian foundation, specialized programs like Automotive Technology and Health Sciences, and the quality of lecturers and education.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
42%
33%
36%
71%
0%
0%
4★
0%
50%
33%
36%
14%
100%
0%
3★
0%
8%
33%
22%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Practical learning and peer engagement

I appreciated Moi University’s strong commitment to hands-on training, research exposure, and mentorship from dedicated lecturers who genuinely supported student growth. The diverse student community enriched my learning experience both culturally and intellectually. Although some administrative processes, like registration and access to resources, could be more efficient, these challenges built my patience and adaptability. Overall, I would highly recommend Moi University for its quality education, supportive environment, and opportunities for both personal and professional development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close