Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University - UPTU vs Technical University of Varna - TU Varna vs Moi University

Side-by-side comparison from 189 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Eastern Africa Baraton (4.60)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM: wins 1/6 categories
WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management: wins 1/6 categories
Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University - UPTU: wins 0/6 categories
Technical University of Varna - TU Varna: wins 0/6 categories
Moi University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Eastern Africa Baraton: wins 4/6 categories
Doshisha University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
Best programme: Business
Best programme: Global MBA
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
eldoret, Kenya
4.00
Read more reviews
88 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Commerce
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
4.50
Win
3.63
4.20
3.92
3.86
2.00
Location
4.31
4.50
3.92
3.80
3.93
4.57
Win
2.67
Professors
4.36
4.50
3.50
3.40
4.24
4.57
Win
2.00
Internationality
4.09
3.50
3.06
4.00
3.75
4.57
Win
3.33
Student life
4.31
Win
3.50
3.79
2.80
4.05
4.29
2.33
Value
4.43
4.50
3.51
4.20
4.16
4.71
Win
2.33
Accommodation
3.35
4.00
3.63
3.80
3.68
4.00
2.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Inspiring and experienced professors
  • +Diverse and enriching student interactions
  • +Relevant programs and vibrant campus life
  • +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
  • +International exposure and real-world business cases
  • +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
  • +Practical, industry-focused curriculum and hands-on project building
  • +Strong faculty guidance and support for learning
  • +Positive campus environment, good culture, and excellent placement opportunities
  • +Engaging curriculum and supportive professors
  • +Active student life and social events
  • +Effective online teaching methods
  • +Dedicated lecturers and strong academic foundation
  • +Diverse student body and vibrant campus life
  • +Hands-on training and research opportunities
  • +Strong faith-based values and spiritual focus
  • +Comprehensive skill development beyond academics
  • +Quality education and competent lecturers
  • +Strong internationalization efforts
Cons
  • -Overcrowded classes limit teacher attention and student support.
  • -Lack of resources and available help outside of the library.
  • -Limited evolution and stagnation within the classroom.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus conditions are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support for students is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and a lack of academic support are prevalent complaints.
  • -Frequent strikes disrupt academic activities and extend graduation timelines.
  • -Administrative issues include delayed payment of staff, fund embezzlement, and missing marks that hinder graduation.
  • -Outdated and poor infrastructure, coupled with overpopulation, negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support was a major concern.
  • -Administrative disorganization and unfulfilled school services.
  • -Outdated curriculum and ineffective teaching.
  • -Lack of career advancement opportunities post-graduation.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution earns its highest marks for **Value** and **Professors**, reflecting strong academic offerings and a positive return on investment. Student life and location also received favorable reviews. The weakest area, **Accommodations**, suggests room for improvement in student housing provisions. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with notable strengths in its core academic and perceived value aspects.

Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.

This university's ratings showcase a generally positive student experience. Location stands out as the strongest area, while Internationality received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation were all rated well, falling within a similar range. Professors and Value also received solid, mid-range scores, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside existing strengths.

This institution presents a generally positive academic and practical offering, excelling in **Facilities** and **Value** with impressive scores of 4.2. Its **Internationality** also stands out at 4. However, **Student Life** emerges as the weakest area, receiving a lower rating of 2.8. Other aspects like **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation** fall within a respectable mid-range.

Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects. Professors and value emerge as the strongest areas, boasting the highest scores. Accommodation is the weakest point, with the lowest rating. Other categories like facilities, location, student life, and internationality are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though not reaching the exceptional levels of the top-performing areas.

The university demonstrates a very strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.71. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** also received exceptionally high marks, all scoring 4.57. Student life is rated well at 4.29, and accommodation is also solid at 4.0. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Facilities**, rated at 3.86.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. Its strongest point is **Internationality**, receiving a significantly higher rating than other categories. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Professors** are identified as the weakest aspects, both scoring at the lowest mark. Student life, accommodation, and value also fall within a similar moderate range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.39 average rating from 74 reviews, ~96% are positive, praising professors, inspiring academic environments, and campus life. A small percentage (~4%) mention overcrowded classes and limited support resources.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.

~90% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, practical curricula, and supportive faculty. ~10% of reviews express dissatisfaction, with one mentioning issues like mark sheet errors.

With a 3.6/5 average, feedback is largely positive (~100% neutral to positive). Recurring themes highlight a well-designed curriculum and friendly, helpful professors. Student council activities are also a positive point.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, dedicated lecturers, and a diverse student body. A small percentage (~5.7%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiencies and occasional missing marks.

University of Eastern Africa, Baraton receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise its Christian foundation, specialized programs like Automotive Technology and Health Sciences, and the quality of lecturers and education.

With an average rating of 2/5, ~67% of reviews are negative. Students cite disorganization, outdated curriculum, and lack of career advancement. One positive review notes internationalization efforts.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
50%
50%
20%
36%
71%
0%
4★
32%
50%
40%
20%
36%
14%
33%
3★
8%
0%
0%
60%
22%
14%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
10%
0%
3%
0%
67%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Blend of business and creativity

Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Practical learning and peer engagement

I appreciated Moi University’s strong commitment to hands-on training, research exposure, and mentorship from dedicated lecturers who genuinely supported student growth. The diverse student community enriched my learning experience both culturally and intellectually. Although some administrative processes, like registration and access to resources, could be more efficient, these challenges built my patience and adaptability. Overall, I would highly recommend Moi University for its quality education, supportive environment, and opportunities for both personal and professional development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close