Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN vs Ulster University vs Columbia University vs Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO vs Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia

Side-by-side comparison from 136 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN: wins 1/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 1/7 categories
Columbia University: wins 5/7 categories
Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia: wins 0/7 categories
New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology - Wintec - WINTEC : wins 0/7 categories
Accra Institute of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
73 reviews
×
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.07
4.49
Win
3.90
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Location
3.00
4.14
4.36
Win
3.95
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.38
Win
4.37
3.95
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.00
4.09
4.44
Win
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
3.00
3.94
4.35
Win
4.18
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.00
4.28
4.44
Win
4.36
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.59
4.22
3.62
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching quality and teacher attentiveness
  • +High-quality education provided by the institution
  • +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
  • +Excellent location and facilities
  • +Supportive and passionate faculty
  • +Diverse and thoughtful food options
  • +Affordable and accessible accommodation
  • +Passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and practical-based courses
  • +Effective teaching methods and dedicated faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Excellent career development support
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited technology are concerns.
  • -The class system is considered insufficient.
Rating summary
What students say

Offering a truly standout experience, this university excels in its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also strong points, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are rated competently at 3, indicating areas for potential development alongside its already impressive strengths.

This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.

This university garners a strong score in Student Life, reaching 4.18, and an even higher mark for Value at 4.36, indicating excellent perceived return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation, rated at 3.62, and Internationality, at 3.55, represent the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Location fall within a similar, moderately positive range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in academics and social engagement, with particularly strong ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life**. Conversely, its weakest areas are **Location** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest possible scores. Facilities and overall value are rated moderately. Internationality is a mid-range strength, indicating a solid but not outstanding global presence.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review expresses strong satisfaction, particularly praising the excellent teaching approach and thoroughness of instructors. This positive feedback represents 100% of the feedback, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.

With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for its passionate and knowledgeable lecturers, conducive learning environment, and practical-based courses. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review (100% negative) suggests administrative issues despite brilliant teachers and good courses. The student experienced a slightly poor administration system.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
56%
42%
36%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
31%
52%
59%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close