Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs The University of Hong Kong - HKU vs The Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus - Senftenberg vs Ulster University vs Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO
Side-by-side comparison from 118 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +Excellent academic quality and teaching by profound scholars.
- +Vibrant campus life with global students and international cultures.
- +Strong career enhancement through industry exposure and mentorship.
- +Research opportunities and multidisciplinary approach
- +Knowledgeable faculty and helpful staff
- +Student-friendly city and proximity to Berlin
- +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
- +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
- +Excellent location and facilities
- +Passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment and practical-based courses
- +Effective teaching methods and dedicated faculty
- +Practical, field-relevant education and skill enhancement
- +Cooperative and supportive faculty
- +Strong academic foundation and professional development
- +High-quality, engaging academic programs and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive learning environment with responsive administration and modern facilities.
- +Opportunities for skill development through extracurricular activities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Overcrowding and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of progression
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Insufficient teachers and coordination
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from faculty and staff is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication are common complaints.
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
This institution receives high marks for its **location**, which scored a 4.44. Other strong areas include **facilities** (4.375), **professors** (4.333), and **value** (4.333). Areas scoring lower are **student life** (3.889) and **accommodation** (3.778), indicating these might be opportunities for improvement. **Internationality** also received a solid rating of 4.222.
The university presents a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in Internationality with a rating of 4.58. Student Life and Value also received high marks. Its weakest area, comparatively, is Location, scoring 3.58. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.
This university garners a strong score in Student Life, reaching 4.18, and an even higher mark for Value at 4.36, indicating excellent perceived return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation, rated at 3.62, and Internationality, at 3.55, represent the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Location fall within a similar, moderately positive range.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across several key areas, with student life receiving the highest marks at 4.75. Professors are also highly regarded, scoring 4.4. Facilities and internationality are rated at a solid 4, while location and value also present favorable scores. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a rating of 3.5.
This university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Value for money stands out as its strongest area, with exceptionally high marks. Facilities, professors, and student life also received very favorable scores. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which is rated lower than other categories, and accommodation, while good, scored slightly below the highest performing areas.
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
Nearly all student feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.41/5. Students highlight excellent academics and dedicated professors, fostering personal growth. Campus life is described as vibrant and supportive.
With a 4/5 average rating from 12 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive, praising multidisciplinary, research-oriented programs and helpful staff. ~8.3% of reviews are negative, citing issues with program progression and teaching quality.
With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.
With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for its passionate and knowledgeable lecturers, conducive learning environment, and practical-based courses. No negative feedback was received.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 4 out of 5 reviews giving 4–5 stars. Students highlight good education, cooperative teachers, and a motivating learning environment. There are no negative reviews.
Most (~83%) students praise UEH, highlighting rewarding experiences, a supportive environment with responsive administration, and an engaging curriculum. The ~17% of reviews express satisfaction with high-quality teaching and international standards.
Nothing to show
This opinion is made in respect of the Master of Law in Human Rights programme at HKU only ("Programme"). The Law Department offers its students many opportunities to be involved in extracurricular initiatives. For instance, the academic staff often hire student researchers and the Center for Comparative and Public Law frequently seek volunteers to assist in their seminars and conferences. One of the Programme's most notable opportunities is a grant with Open Society Foundations called the 'rights and governance internship'. The Law Department also has innovative street law and clinic initiatives. Further, many of its academic staff are legal practitioners and integrate anecdotes from their practices in the classroom, which is both interesting and beneficial to the learning environment. The class sizes are intimate and allow for in-depth discussions. The elective selection could be broader (the electives are also subject to last minute changes) and the compulsory courses are not the best-fitted for all students. Since the Programme accepts students without a law degree, it is sometimes difficult to reconcile the different backgrounds and meaningfully begin a legal discussion. Some students are in the Programme for the purpose of getting an 'easy' masters-level law degree. Overall, the Programme is terrific if you are proactive in seeking opportunities to advance your studies and pave a path for your next steps. You can build strong networks. Students entering with a more passive mindset may be disappointed with the experience though.
I had a scholarship in a joint program to study a master degree in HCSM, I got the opportunity to spend the summer semester of 2019 in Btu in Cottbus, which I can say was an amazing experience, the modules, the professors, and the staff at the campus and the dormitories are very knowledgeable and very helpful, and at the time of the corona the way the university dealt with the pandemic was really impressive, they tried to help us (students) in every way possible, I always tell my friends that the learning experience in Germany is much positively different from any other place in the world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I Have been working here since July-2012 . I always find motivation & learning paradigm for me . I learnt a lot during these years . My subjects are related to CS , I have seen graduation of almost 11 batches . This programme enhances my skills & confidence . They give me opportunity in different aspects as well , I also supervises various students every year for their FYPs . I am also a female advisor for all the female students.
Nothing to show
