Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Boston College - BC vs Saxion University of Applied Sciences vs Gannon University vs Universidad Hispanoamericana - UH
Side-by-side comparison from 85 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
- +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
- +Competent and supportive professors
- +Flexible learning options and diverse programs
- +Positive campus environment and valuable learning experiences
- +Practical, career-oriented curriculum and useful course content
- +Supportive and friendly teachers providing concrete feedback
- +Welcoming international environment and comfortable study spaces
Nothing to show
- +**Academic excellence and practical learning:** Students appreciate the focus on high-quality education that incorporates real-world application.
- +**Welcoming and motivating environment:** The supportive and collaborative atmosphere fosters student development.
- +**Experienced and engaging faculty:** Teachers are recognized for their professional expertise and ability to connect theory with practice.
- +Supportive and professional faculty
- +Practical, job-market relevant education
- +Dynamic and enriching learning environment
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented by many students.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a common complaint.
- -Students frequently express dissatisfaction with administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum is often criticized for being outdated and irrelevant.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -There are consistent issues with administrative support and course management.
- -Students find the curriculum and teaching methods to be unengaging and outdated.
Nothing to show
Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.
An overview of university ratings reveals a strong showing in several key areas. The university excels in **Location**, receiving its highest score. **Facilities** and **Value** are also rated very positively. Conversely, **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest aspect, with a lower score compared to other metrics. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also received solid marks.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in internationality, earning a rating of 4.42, and excels in facilities and value, both scoring 4.33. Student life is rated 3.67, slightly above the professor rating of 3.58. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a score of 3.
Nothing to show
Exceptional marks were awarded for its prime **location**, receiving a perfect 5. The university also scored well in **facilities** and **internationality**, both earning 4s. Conversely, the **professors** received the lowest rating at 2.5. **Student life**, **accommodation**, and **value** all received solid mid-range scores of 3.5.
The institution garners exceptional praise for its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Student Life** also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** receives the lowest rating among the assessed areas. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are all rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.
Reviews are highly positive (~92%), praising competent and supportive professors, flexible learning options, and a good learning environment. A small percentage of feedback noted city noise.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and supportive teachers. Some mention occasional disorganization and a chaotic online platform. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, nearly 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight academic excellence and a welcoming environment, with the Faculty of Administration noted for its practical approach.
~91% of reviews are positive, praising the institution for its professional lecturers, great learning experience, and modern facilities. A small amount of feedback mentions slow administration processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Saxion - CMGT - Creative Media and Game Technologies - 2.5/5 TLDR: I only recommend the CMGT course to someone who is already disciplined to REALLY study the gaming topic they are interested in outside the dedicated time for the university. If you are looking for a course that makes you "game industry ready" look elsewhere. I finished the CMGT (Creative Media and Game Technologies) course as an artist in 2022. I went to Saxion (Enschede) with the dream of becoming a concept artist for video games (as advertised on the official website), after 4 years and €10000 dept I can say that I would have gotten the same knowledge out of top €1000 in relevant courses. A lot of the topics we went through are just "oh that's interesting to know, so when can I learn to draw concept art?". There was a lack of focus for artist in general (2D and 3D), you never get deep into any topic and most things except the bare basics are for you to learn in your own time. In addition, the amount of actual gaming projects is laughable for a course that advertises itself as gaming focused. But there were good things, even great things. The fellow students were very great partners and the teachers are knowledgeable and easy going. There is a very low focus on "memorize this and write it down" type test. 95% of the (art) grades are project based, meaning you create something (concepts, prototypes etc.) with other CMGT students (Other branches of CMGT are programmer and designer). Enschede itself is a great city to life in, with more than enough places to visit to fill the years with activities. In the last 2 years the students focus on larger projects, and for me, it was the case that the actual document that will be uploaded is much, much more important than the actual product we create. This was very frustrating because as an artist, I want to make things, not write documents all day. I would only recommend the CMGT to someone that is: 1) In need of a guided education about the basics of game making (equivalent of easy to get courses online) but more expensive of course 2) Interested in living in the Netherlands and experiencing the culture 3) Looking for an "easy" bachelor that can be obtained if you put in a bit of effort 4) A hardworking individual that does the bachelor on the side while advancing in their own domain of interest. Afterword: At the end of my study, I was so removed from what I actually wanted to learn that I could not advance professionally in the field I wanted to work in (concept art). Instead, I learned some things about UI design, which to be honest is a topic I really don't care about. **Important Note: The last 2 years of my studies were impacted by the covid pandemic.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am having a great experience studying at Zetech University. The lecturers are always available to support students and ensure they are equiped with necessary skills to tackle real world challenges. The campus has modern facilities, including a well-equipped library and great study spaces. However, I feel that the administration could improve response times when handling student concerns. More career counseling and mental well-being services would also be helpful. Overall, I highly recommend this university to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive and friendly environment.
Nothing to show
