University of Ghana - UG vs Politecnico di Milano vs Coe College vs Ho Technical University - HTU vs University of Health and Allied Sciences - UHAS

Side-by-side comparison from 344 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Ghana - UG (4.30)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 0/6 categories
Politecnico di Milano: wins 0/6 categories
Coe College: wins 0/6 categories
Ho Technical University - HTU: wins 5/6 categories
University of Health and Allied Sciences - UHAS: wins 1/6 categories
Australian College of Business and Technology - acbt: wins 0/6 categories
Tribhuvan University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Architecture
Rapids, Iowa, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Biochemistry
Kolhapur, India
4.00
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.99
Not rated
4.00
3.40
Not rated
3.42
Location
4.32
4.25
Not rated
4.33
Win
2.80
Not rated
4.25
Professors
4.25
4.08
Not rated
4.33
Win
3.60
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.08
4.26
Not rated
4.33
Win
2.80
Not rated
3.50
Student life
4.29
4.07
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.50
Not rated
3.73
Value
4.22
4.29
Not rated
4.00
4.40
Win
Not rated
3.42
Accommodation
3.48
3.70
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.25
Not rated
3.17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +High academic quality and challenging, skill-building programs.
  • +Excellent organizational support and clear guidance, especially for international students.
  • +Strong professor expertise and modern, well-equipped facilities.

Nothing to show

  • +Skilled and supportive teaching, with extra practice opportunities
  • +Good facilities, including wifi and comfortable lecture halls
  • +Practical learning and broad industry-relevant knowledge acquisition
  • +Engaging academic environment and knowledgeable, approachable lecturers
  • +Practical training and professional preparation
  • +Modern resources and collaborative atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and academic foundation
  • +Diverse faculty and peer connections
  • +Strong program offerings and curriculum
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and disorienting administrative processes are a recurring problem.
  • -Teaching quality often disappoints, with professors lacking pedagogical skills despite academic prestige.
  • -Arbitrary grading systems and poorly designed exams lead to frustration and high failure rates.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and student comfort.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact academics.
  • -University politics disrupt classes, exams, and results.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This institution receives strong marks across several key areas. Its highest-rated aspects include Internationality and Value, both scoring above 4.2. Location also performs exceptionally well, nearly matching these top scores. Student Life and Professors are rated highly, generally around 4.07. Facilities and Accomodation represent the weakest areas, with Accomodation being the lowest at approximately 3.7.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners strong feedback. Student life stands out as the highest-rated aspect, reflecting a vibrant campus experience. Facilities and accommodation received solid scores, while professors, location, and internationality were also highly regarded. Value for money was also rated positively. The university presents a well-rounded offering with student life as a particular strength.

Overall, the university garners a strong rating for **Value** at 4.4. Areas of particular strength also include **Student Life** (3.5) and **Professors** (3.6). Conversely, the university receives its lowest scores for **Location** and **Internationality**, both at 2.8. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** fall in the middle range.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** are also highly regarded. Areas for improvement are **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, which scored lower than other aspects. **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these categories.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

With an average rating of 4.04/5 and ~88% positive feedback, students praise academic quality, international environment, and well-organized admissions. Some negative feedback points to teaching quality and course support.

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback, students praise skilled lecturers, understandable teaching, and excellent practical lessons. Facilities like Wi-Fi and well-spaced lecture halls are also highlighted.

The university receives largely positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight excellent management, knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, and engaging academic environments with good practical exposure. Some suggest room for infrastructure improvement.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from 12 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive, highlighting excellent professors and strong academic foundations. A small amount of negative feedback (~8.3%) mentions corruption and administrative issues affecting classes and results.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
29%
0%
0%
20%
0%
42%
4★
47%
55%
0%
100%
40%
0%
25%
3★
11%
12%
0%
0%
40%
0%
25%
2★
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Driven to succeed

I have experienced a lot of personalities in this university, some lecturers are very rude when you ask questions, like the thought of you even being slightly confused at what theyre saying is a crime, while some are eager to answer your questions and even welcome it, all in all i personally focus on the good ones because i am here for a purpose. But if you're really sensitive and these things are what you look out for, then this might come as a shock to you.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close