University of Ghana - UG vs Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology - KNUST vs Lehigh University vs Clark University vs Sunyani Technical University - STU
Side-by-side comparison from 480 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
- +Engaging and practical courses
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong academic standards and critical thinking focus
- +Supportive professors and hands-on learning experiences
- +Vibrant social life and strong sense of community
- +Rigorous academics with strong business and engineering programs
- +Practical and rich specialized courses
- +Knowledgeable and engaging professors
- +Welcoming and interactive environment
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive campus environment and good facilities
- +Effective and accessible online management system
- +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers.
- +Strong academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
- +Well-structured programs with practical project engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
- -Poor administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities.
- -Lack of student welfare and support.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to confusion.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
This university demonstrates a strong profile across multiple metrics. Location and Value are particularly highly rated, suggesting excellent external appeal and perceived worth. Student Life and Professors also receive commendations, indicating positive campus engagement and academic quality. Accommodation, however, stands out as the weakest area, receiving a notably lower score compared to other aspects. Internationality and Facilities present solid, above-average performance.
This university receives strong ratings, particularly excelling in the quality of its professors, scoring a 4.5. Facilities and value are also highly rated at 4.33. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both receiving 3.67. Student life and internationality are rated solidly at 4 and 4.17 respectively.
This institution demonstrates an excellent overall profile. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both receiving perfect scores. Student Life, Facilities, and Professors are also highly regarded with 4.5 ratings. Accommodations are the weakest point, scoring a 4, though still very positive. The value proposition is also rated highly at 4.5.
This university garners strong marks in several key areas, notably excelling in its **location** with a near-perfect score. **Professors**, **student life**, and **value** also receive high praise. However, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing. **Facilities** and **internationality** receive solid, positive ratings, contributing to an overall favorable assessment.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors (4.35)** and **value (4.25)**, as well as a well-regarded **student life (4)**. The **location (3.94)** also receives positive feedback. However, **facilities (3.05)** represent the weakest area according to these ratings, with **accommodation (3.4)** and **internationality (3.4)** falling in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
With a 4.41/5 average rating from 197 reviews, ~99.5% of feedback is positive, highlighting engaging courses, knowledgeable professors, and practical learning. A single negative review noted insufficient solar power generation content.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great academic and social experiences, supportive professors, and strong programs like engineering and business. A small amount of feedback mentions dated classrooms.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and 0% negative feedback, student reviews highlight practical and rich specialized courses. Professors are noted as knowledgeable and friendly, fostering an enjoyable and welcoming learning environment.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight good facilities, engaging academics, and dedicated lecturers. A recurring challenge is the lack of student accommodation.
With a high average rating of 4.35/5 from 20 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise friendly atmospheres, approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, and a strong foundation for academic and personal growth. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.
In 2023, my University, KNUST, won the overall best in the world in education. I like the fact that my University gives me the best. Anyone looking for the University now should check through KNUST. There are a lot of opportunities KNUST has for you. Our campuses always look stunning. There are parts where you get to meet Managing Directors of businesses sharing live journeys with us, and I love that.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I like the school because of their Technology level. They have a very responsive advanced management system which make students access all their education needs online and with ease. They teach very well to the understanding of the students. It deserves to be an international school. Is really a good school. But the only thing not actually interesting about it is their school fees are high.
My experience at this university has been highly rewarding. The programme is well-structured, with dedicated lecturers who provide strong academic and professional guidance. I particularly appreciated the supportive learning environment, access to resources, and opportunities to engage in practical projects that enhanced my knowledge. The university also promotes diversity and collaboration, which made the learning experience more enriching. While there could be improvements in administrative processes, overall, I would strongly recommend this university to anyone seeking quality education and personal growth.
Nothing to show
