University of Ghana - UG vs FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management vs Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology - KNUST vs Lehigh University vs Sunyani Technical University - STU

Side-by-side comparison from 479 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 0/7 categories
FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management: wins 4/7 categories
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology - KNUST: wins 3/7 categories
Lehigh University: wins 0/7 categories
Sunyani Technical University - STU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Energy and Natural Resources - uenr: wins 0/7 categories
Catholic University of Ghana - CUG: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
4.20
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Hospitality Management
Best programme: Agribusiness Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
5.00
Win
4.28
4.33
4.00
3.05
Not rated
Location
4.32
5.00
Win
4.45
3.67
4.63
3.94
Not rated
Professors
4.25
5.00
Win
4.34
4.50
4.25
4.35
Not rated
Internationality
4.08
4.00
4.17
Win
4.17
4.00
3.40
Not rated
Student life
4.29
3.00
4.33
Win
4.00
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.22
5.00
Win
4.42
4.33
4.25
4.25
Not rated
Accommodation
3.48
3.00
3.80
Win
3.67
3.13
3.40
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Practical and theoretical learning relevance for careers
  • +Qualified professors with industry experience
  • +Collaborative learning through shared practical experiences
  • +Engaging and practical courses
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Strong academic standards and critical thinking focus
  • +Supportive professors and hands-on learning experiences
  • +Vibrant social life and strong sense of community
  • +Rigorous academics with strong business and engineering programs
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Supportive campus environment and good facilities
  • +Effective and accessible online management system
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Strong academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
  • +Well-structured programs with practical project engagement.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication is frustrating.
  • -Poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities.
  • -Lack of student welfare and support.
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to confusion.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This institution excels significantly in its facilities, professor quality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Its location also garners top marks. Areas for improvement are student life and accommodation, both rated moderately. Internationality is a strong point, though not as high as the leading categories.

This university demonstrates a strong profile across multiple metrics. Location and Value are particularly highly rated, suggesting excellent external appeal and perceived worth. Student Life and Professors also receive commendations, indicating positive campus engagement and academic quality. Accommodation, however, stands out as the weakest area, receiving a notably lower score compared to other aspects. Internationality and Facilities present solid, above-average performance.

This university receives strong ratings, particularly excelling in the quality of its professors, scoring a 4.5. Facilities and value are also highly rated at 4.33. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both receiving 3.67. Student life and internationality are rated solidly at 4 and 4.17 respectively.

This university garners strong marks in several key areas, notably excelling in its **location** with a near-perfect score. **Professors**, **student life**, and **value** also receive high praise. However, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing. **Facilities** and **internationality** receive solid, positive ratings, contributing to an overall favorable assessment.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors (4.35)** and **value (4.25)**, as well as a well-regarded **student life (4)**. The **location (3.94)** also receives positive feedback. However, **facilities (3.05)** represent the weakest area according to these ratings, with **accommodation (3.4)** and **internationality (3.4)** falling in the mid-range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This feedback highlights a good blend of theoretical and practical learning, relevant to future careers, and qualified professors.

With a 4.41/5 average rating from 197 reviews, ~99.5% of feedback is positive, highlighting engaging courses, knowledgeable professors, and practical learning. A single negative review noted insufficient solar power generation content.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great academic and social experiences, supportive professors, and strong programs like engineering and business. A small amount of feedback mentions dated classrooms.

With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight good facilities, engaging academics, and dedicated lecturers. A recurring challenge is the lack of student accommodation.

With a high average rating of 4.35/5 from 20 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise friendly atmospheres, approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, and a strong foundation for academic and personal growth. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
100%
53%
33%
50%
55%
0%
4★
47%
0%
36%
50%
38%
25%
0%
3★
11%
0%
11%
17%
13%
20%
0%
2★
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Good theory-practice mix, qualified professors

In my opinion, it was a good mix of theoretic and action-based learning and therefore relevant for the job. The professors were very qualified and also had work experience. The exchange between students about the practical experience is part of the classes and helps to learn different perspectives.

Opportunities

In 2023, my University, KNUST, won the overall best in the world in education. I like the fact that my University gives me the best. Anyone looking for the University now should check through KNUST. There are a lot of opportunities KNUST has for you. Our campuses always look stunning. There are parts where you get to meet Managing Directors of businesses sharing live journeys with us, and I love that.

Nothing to show

A very practical and productive knowledge

I like the school because of their Technology level. They have a very responsive advanced management system which make students access all their education needs online and with ease. They teach very well to the understanding of the students. It deserves to be an international school. Is really a good school. But the only thing not actually interesting about it is their school fees are high.

Excellent Academic Support and Opportunities

My experience at this university has been highly rewarding. The programme is well-structured, with dedicated lecturers who provide strong academic and professional guidance. I particularly appreciated the supportive learning environment, access to resources, and opportunities to engage in practical projects that enhanced my knowledge. The university also promotes diversity and collaboration, which made the learning experience more enriching. While there could be improvements in administrative processes, overall, I would strongly recommend this university to anyone seeking quality education and personal growth.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close