emlyon business school vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs OP Jindal Global University - JGU vs Panjab University

Side-by-side comparison from 87 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique: wins 0/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
OP Jindal Global University - JGU: wins 2/7 categories
Panjab University: wins 3/7 categories
RIMT University - RIMT: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Art and Design
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
chandigarh, India
4.40
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Art Management
chandigarh, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.16
4.00
3.25
4.44
Win
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.54
3.00
4.75
3.50
4.88
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.05
4.00
3.25
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.56
Win
4.00
3.50
4.24
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.24
3.00
3.75
3.88
4.38
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.40
Win
4.00
2.75
3.94
4.30
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.94
4.00
2.00
4.59
Win
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
  • +Supportive environment & welcoming community
  • +Prestigious European university for design
  • +Focus on practical application over theory
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Practical, real-world focus and curriculum
  • +Supportive faculty and positive learning environment
  • +Good career prospects and specialized programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Peaceful and motivating campus environment
  • +Strong academic and research resources

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -High fees and perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Poor quality of accommodation and food.
  • -Institutional focus on finances over student welfare and study quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to delayed and unclear communication regarding exams and results.
  • -Outdated facilities and a decline in university ranking are disappointing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **accommodations**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities also received a high rating. Conversely, the **location** was the least positively reviewed aspect. Student life, internationality, and value represent solid middle-ground strengths, with professors also scoring favorably.

Remarkably high scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **Location**, boasting an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive commendation at 4.5. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the area with the lowest rating at 3.888. The university demonstrates a strong performance in Student Life (4.375) and Value (4.3), with good marks also awarded for Internationality (4.1) and Accommodation (3.875).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, well-structured programs, and helpful faculty. A small portion, ~12%, expressed concerns about cost and facilities.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and a peaceful campus. ~10% of feedback noted issues with examination management and slow results.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
58%
0%
50%
29%
60%
0%
0%
4★
29%
100%
25%
41%
30%
0%
0%
3★
11%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
6%
10%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
25%
6%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close