Ecole Nationale des Sciences Appliquées de Kenitra - ENSAK vs ESSEC Business School vs İzmir Institute of Technology - IZTECH vs Univerzita Jana Amose Komenského vs Ibn Tofail University - UIT
Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse engineering majors and foundational learning
- +Abundant extracurricular opportunities
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Experienced professors and high-quality technical programs
- +Strong research facilities and technology-focused environment
- +Opportunities for international students and industry connections
- +Engaging and informative instruction
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Valuable networking and career opportunities
- +Academic growth and skill development
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Committed and helpful faculty
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of clear communication and support
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of engaging academic engagement and structured learning.
- -Limited opportunities for social interaction and cultural immersion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect from student needs are prevalent complaints.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as strengths or weaknesses, as all aspects of the university appear to be rated equally low.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
This institution shines in its **facilities** and **professors**, both receiving exceptional scores. Its **value** is also rated highly. Conversely, **accommodation** emerges as a significant area for improvement, with the lowest score. **Student life** and **internationality** are rated moderately, while **location** falls somewhere in between.
This institution presents a mixed performance based on its ratings. Strongest areas include its facilities and location, both receiving a respectable 3 out of 5. Conversely, professors and student life stand out as weakest points, each scoring a low 1. Accommodation, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately at 2.
Evaluations indicate a strong academic environment with high scores for Professors (4.36) and Facilities (4.29). Value for money also scores well at 4.14. Areas for improvement include Accomodation (3.54) and Internationality (3.43), which received the lowest ratings. Student Life (3.79) and Location (4.00) fall in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review rates the university 5/5, indicating a highly positive sentiment (~100%). The feedback highlights a variety of engineering majors and extracurriculars.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5. Students highlight experienced professors, state-of-the-art labs, English instruction, and entrepreneurial opportunities.
With a 2/5 average rating, all feedback is negative. The sole review expresses disappointment with a lack of structured classes, no final exam, and limited opportunities to interact with local students or culture.
With an average rating of 4.07/5, ~79% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic growth, supportive environments, and committed lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
IZTECH has everything a student would need to brighten his/her future. For example. in the computer engineering department, professors are so experienced and good at teaching that, wow. It is just awesome.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
