Sciences Po vs Université de Poitiers vs EDHEC Business School vs Clermont School of Business vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 305 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum and diverse academic focus
- +Networking opportunities and career prospects
- +Vibrant student life and diverse community
- +Approachable, invested, and knowledgeable faculty
- +Stimulating and supportive academic environment
- +Clean, comfortable, and well-maintained facilities
- +High-quality teaching with industry-experienced professors
- +Strong corporate network and alumni support for career development
- +Practical, challenging courses aligning with employer needs
- +modern facilities and organization
- +international environment and diverse student body
- +quality teaching and practical learning experiences
- +Practical curriculum & professional instructors
- +International opportunities & diverse environment
- +Strong alumni network & career preparation
- +Welcoming international community & diverse backgrounds
- +Interactive flipped classroom & engaging discussions
- +Approachable professors & personal development focus
- +Strong aerospace focus with practical application.
- +Vibrant student life and numerous associations.
- +Good balance of theory and practice.
- -Academics are often ineffective and lack preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Steep tuition fees are a significant financial burden.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of relevant coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues, including lack of student support.
- -Overloaded schedules and insufficient opportunities for independent learning or skill development.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value.
- -Unprofessional training and high tuition costs without adequate support.
- -Misalignment between program offerings and student expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly for its **Internationality**, which stands out at 4.7. **Location** and **Value** also score very highly, both at 4.39. Student life and professors also received strong ratings above 4.2. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.16, while facilities are rated at 3.83.
This institution shows a generally positive reception across its evaluated aspects. Student life stands out as a particular strength, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, location and value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded, with professors and internationality performing strongly.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Internationality** (4.44) and **Professors** (4.33), indicating a strong global outlook and excellent academic staff. **Facilities** (4.32) and **Student Life** (4.17) also receive positive marks. The weakest area is **Accomodation** (3.26), suggesting room for improvement in housing options. **Location** (3.83) is a moderate strength, while **Value** (4.06) is also well-regarded.
This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area, achieving a rating of 4.61. **Location** also received high marks at 4.42. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring 4.10. Other categories such as Professors, Student Life, and Value all fall within a closely clustered range of 4.30 to 4.37, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
This university garners high marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** also received a strong rating. The **Facilities** are well-regarded, while **Professors** and **Value** are rated moderately. The **Accomodation** is the lowest-scoring aspect, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.
Overall, the university receives strong marks across various aspects. Professors and location are particularly lauded, achieving the highest scores. Student life and internationality also perform well. While accommodation is rated slightly lower, the university demonstrates a solid standing in facilities and value, with no significantly weak areas identified.
This institution receives its highest accolades for student life and facilities, both scoring well above average. Conversely, the location emerges as a significant concern, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like professors, accommodation, and value present a more moderate, positive picture, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle.
With ~96% positive feedback and an average 4.08/5 rating, students praise the interdisciplinary curriculum, academic excellence, and vibrant student life. A small ~4% of reviews express disappointment with specific academic approaches.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 16 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise approachable and invested teachers, quality lessons, and a clean, comfortable study environment.
With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 49 reviews, ~98% are positive. Students highlight excellent teaching quality, strong industry connections, practical courses, and valuable career support. Minimal negative feedback questioned tuition costs versus benefits.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising modern facilities, international environment, and practical learning. A small minority, ~5%, express disappointment with teaching quality and program relevance.
~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and networking. A small portion of feedback (~4.4%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and course relevance.
Students report a highly positive experience (~100%), highlighting the welcoming international community and engaging, interactive teaching methods. Professors are approachable, and opportunities like double degrees are appreciated. No negative feedback was recorded.
Students praise extensive practical aerospace training and vibrant student life with numerous associations. The university's isolated location is a recurring concern, though positive feedback suggests it doesn't overshadow the strong sense of community.
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
The course itself was great as it gave me ideas into a new world and now i have a better understanding and the know-how in fintech. Overall, teaching staff are professionnel and supporting in ensuring we get the best out of our time there
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
