University of Sunderland vs McMaster University vs General Assembly vs Lighthouse Labs vs University of Prince Edward Island - UPEI

Side-by-side comparison from 183 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: General Assembly (5.00)
University of Sunderland: wins 0/7 categories
McMaster University: wins 2/7 categories
General Assembly: wins 4/7 categories
Lighthouse Labs: wins 0/7 categories
University of Prince Edward Island - UPEI: wins 0/7 categories
Douglas College New Westminster: wins 1/7 categories
Holland College - HC: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Sunderland, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
63 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Hamilton, Canada
4.40
Read more reviews
85 reviews
×
Best programme: Life Science
New York City, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Vancouver, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Accounting
Charlottetown, Canada
3.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.52
4.22
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.13
3.88
3.00
Location
4.15
4.13
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.23
4.71
4.00
Professors
4.44
4.22
4.00
Not rated
4.35
4.88
Win
4.33
Internationality
4.24
4.49
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.22
4.38
2.67
Student life
4.07
4.16
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.04
4.25
3.00
Value
4.16
4.38
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.25
4.00
Accommodation
3.75
4.10
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.78
3.13
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
  • +Supportive and passionate professors
  • +Welcoming and diverse student community
  • +Engaging and versatile academic programs
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming community and supportive atmosphere
  • +High-quality academics and engaging instructors
  • +Diverse opportunities for personal and academic growth
  • +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
  • +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
  • +Abundant student resources for academic success
  • +Welcoming campus & helpful instructors
  • +Good starting point for further education
  • +Local accessibility
Cons
  • -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is frequently criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with a lack of communication and administrative support.
  • -Overcrowded classes and limited course availability create significant frustrations.
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
  • -Excessive and poorly communicated administrative issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.

This university receives its highest marks in **Internationality**, boasting a rating of 4.49. Close behind is **Value** at 4.38, followed by **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring 4.22. The **Location** also performs well with a 4.13 rating. The **weakest area** of the university, though still strong, is **Accomodation** at 4.10. Overall, the institution presents a very positive picture.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university receives favorable ratings, with its strongest areas being **Professors** (4.35) and **Location** (4.23). **Internationality** (4.22) also scores well. The weakest aspect identified is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.78, while **Student Life** (4.04) and **Facilities** (4.13) are also areas for potential improvement. **Value** received a solid 4.0 rating.

A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **internationality** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Ratings for facilities, student life, and accommodation are moderate, while value for money is well-regarded.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.

Approximately 90% of university reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community, knowledgeable and passionate professors, and a positive academic experience. No negative feedback was reported.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.39/5 from 23 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight a welcoming atmosphere, strong sense of community, and rewarding academic and social experiences.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 3.33 average rating from 3 reviews, ~33% of feedback is positive. Students appreciate the welcoming campus and helpful instructors, viewing it as a good starting point. Some inconsistency in coursework difficulty was noted.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
53%
100%
0%
48%
63%
0%
4★
43%
36%
0%
0%
43%
25%
33%
3★
14%
11%
0%
0%
9%
13%
67%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Combined Honors in Economics and Mathematics

Joining Mcmaster University is a wonderful experience. I personally have learned a lot. In addition, I really recommend and encourage students to join this school. University has a variety of courses.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close