Université Rennes-II-Haute-Bretagne vs EPITECH - EPITECH vs IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School vs INSA Rennes vs Agrocampus Ouest

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université Rennes-II-Haute-Bretagne: wins 1/6 categories
EPITECH - EPITECH: wins 5/6 categories
IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School: wins 0/6 categories
INSA Rennes: wins 0/6 categories
Agrocampus Ouest: wins 0/6 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/6 categories
EPSI l’école de l’ingénierie informatique: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: English
Best programme: ACS - Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Data Science
Rennes, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Rennes, France
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Horticulture
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.50
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.50
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Win
3.50
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and challenging courses
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and cultural immersion
  • +High-quality, balanced training with relevant topics.
  • +Strong company network for work-study and employment.
  • +Strong French language support
  • +Rigorous academic programs

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive horticulture and landscaping programs
  • +Strong sense of community and collective spirit
  • +Abundant extracurricular activities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and resources impacts student success.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on profit over student well-being and quality of education.
  • -Lack of soft skills oriented learning, despite a strong technical environment.
  • -High cost of education.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources were a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support was a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are common complaints.
  • -Unclear communication and insufficient support hinder student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners positive marks across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest rating at 4.5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation are all rated a solid 4. The university also performs reasonably well in terms of Value, scoring 3.5. The primary area for potential improvement is **Internationality**, which received the lowest rating of 3.

This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in its student life and internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded with a top rating. Facilities and location are strong points, both at 4.5. Value for money is rated well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving high ratings. Areas of average performance include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation**. The university offers a well-rounded experience with particularly positive aspects in its infrastructure, student engagement, global outlook, and cost-effectiveness.

Nothing to show

This institution receives particularly strong marks for its vibrant student life, achieving a perfect score. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a moderate three. Professors, location, and overall value are well-regarded, each earning a solid four. Internationality also sits at a respectable three.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, the 2 reviews indicate overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%). Students praise the enriching experience, challenging courses, and supportive professors, particularly within the international exchange program.

Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average. ~40% of feedback is negative, citing high cost and lack of student well-being support. Positive feedback highlights excellent training and good employment networks.

With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is predominantly positive. One reviewer highlighted a challenging yet rewarding academic experience with French and English program requirements.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). The single review highlights strong academic programs in Horticulture and Landscaping, a good collective atmosphere, and ample after-school activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
20%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
50%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A challenging but worthwhile experience

IMT Atlantique Brest was an interesting phase in my academic life. Coming from an Anglophone educational system to a Francophone teaching style was quite a challenge at the beginning, but worthwhile in the end. My programme was in both French and English(60/40). Although I spoke a bit of French, it still required more knowledge to sail through the programme. This was made possible through the school's compulsory weekly French classes. The programme was very rigorous as we spent most of our time in class, in lab sessions or doing group projects. The professors are knowledgeable in their field and try to engage the students in each lesson, although some of them aren't good at transferring knowledge appropriately. The career seminars and job dating events were very beneficial in finding an internship and a job in the long run. Lastly, the intercultural environment helped me learn about different cultures, and also prepare me to work in multicultural teams in the real world. Overall, it was a good experience as I learned to study in a new language, make new friends and stand on my own in a new country. I just wish I did more research into the French teaching style before starting the programme.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close