Université Rennes-II-Haute-Bretagne vs Université de Rennes I vs EPITECH - EPITECH vs INSA Rennes vs Agrocampus Ouest

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université Rennes-II-Haute-Bretagne: wins 0/6 categories
Université de Rennes I: wins 1/6 categories
EPITECH - EPITECH: wins 5/6 categories
INSA Rennes: wins 0/6 categories
Agrocampus Ouest: wins 0/6 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/6 categories
EPSI l’école de l’ingénierie informatique: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: English
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: ACS - Applied Computer Science
Rennes, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Rennes, France
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Horticulture
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
3.80
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.17
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.50
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.17
Win
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and challenging courses
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and cultural immersion
  • +Expert faculty and diverse academic programs
  • +Welcoming environment and engaging campus life
  • +Beautiful and well-equipped campus facilities
  • +High-quality, balanced training with relevant topics.
  • +Strong company network for work-study and employment.

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive horticulture and landscaping programs
  • +Strong sense of community and collective spirit
  • +Abundant extracurricular activities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and resources impacts student success.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disappointing.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on profit over student well-being and quality of education.
  • -Lack of soft skills oriented learning, despite a strong technical environment.
  • -High cost of education.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are common complaints.
  • -Unclear communication and insufficient support hinder student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners positive marks across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest rating at 4.5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation are all rated a solid 4. The university also performs reasonably well in terms of Value, scoring 3.5. The primary area for potential improvement is **Internationality**, which received the lowest rating of 3.

Overall, this institution garners strong positive feedback. Student life and accommodation stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both achieving a score of approximately 4.17. The university also received solid ratings of 4 for facilities, professors, internationality, and value. Location is the lowest-scoring area, though still rated positively at 3.8.

This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in its student life and internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded with a top rating. Facilities and location are strong points, both at 4.5. Value for money is rated well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5.

Nothing to show

This institution receives particularly strong marks for its vibrant student life, achieving a perfect score. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a moderate three. Professors, location, and overall value are well-regarded, each earning a solid four. Internationality also sits at a respectable three.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, the 2 reviews indicate overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%). Students praise the enriching experience, challenging courses, and supportive professors, particularly within the international exchange program.

All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise the dynamic academic setting, diverse programs, expert faculty, and well-maintained facilities. Some mention a desire for better parking and cafeteria food.

Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average. ~40% of feedback is negative, citing high cost and lack of student well-being support. Positive feedback highlights excellent training and good employment networks.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). The single review highlights strong academic programs in Horticulture and Landscaping, a good collective atmosphere, and ample after-school activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
100%
20%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close