London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Kingston University - KU vs Ulster University vs 1Training vs London Business Training and Consulting

Side-by-side comparison from 440 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ulster University (4.40)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 3/7 categories
Kingston University - KU: wins 1/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 3/7 categories
1Training: wins 0/7 categories
London Business Training and Consulting: wins 0/7 categories
London Financial Studies: wins 0/7 categories
Bywater: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
79 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.15
Win
4.07
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.78
Win
4.07
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.10
4.38
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.30
4.09
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.63
3.91
3.94
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.04
4.07
4.28
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.78
Win
3.62
3.59
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, practical and relevant course content
  • +Inclusive campus environment with many opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Strong support systems and useful resources for students
  • +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
  • +Excellent location and facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts studies.
  • -Disorganized student union and indifferent faculty are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value also received favorable scores. Student Life and Accomodation are areas where improvements could be beneficial, as they received the lowest ratings in the survey.

This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

Kingston University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 80 reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.19/5. Key strengths include knowledgeable lecturers, practical course content, and a supportive environment, though a small percentage (~2.5%) noted poor management and lack of resources.

With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
41%
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
44%
42%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
19%
16%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Human Geography

The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close