Rennes School of Business vs SKEMA Business School vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 347 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ISCOD (4.90)
Rennes School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
ISCOD: wins 3/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
61 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Paris, France
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.03
4.21
3.97
3.73
3.92
4.71
Win
4.50
Location
4.22
4.23
4.27
4.14
4.93
Win
4.82
4.60
Professors
4.21
4.39
3.93
3.90
4.64
4.81
4.83
Win
Internationality
4.34
4.40
4.30
3.87
4.93
Win
4.17
4.67
Student life
4.37
4.14
4.25
4.07
4.15
4.32
4.50
Win
Value
4.11
4.07
3.93
3.70
4.29
4.97
Win
4.17
Accommodation
3.76
3.59
3.59
3.37
3.62
4.79
Win
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
  • +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
  • +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
  • +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
  • +Diverse, multicultural environment and global opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching and practical, well-structured curriculum
  • +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
  • +Strong marketing & business programs
  • +Excellent student support & community
  • +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Flexible, remote, and work-study options
  • +Personalized and supportive academic and professional guidance
  • +Comprehensive courses and responsive, passionate trainers
  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
  • -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
  • -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
  • -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
  • -Superficial course content and lack of practical value were disappointing.
  • -The program's focus did not align with student expectations or career goals.
  • -High tuition costs were not justified by the perceived quality of education and career support.
  • -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
  • -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
  • -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a major drawback.
  • -Limited course options and inflexible scheduling cause significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.

Internationality, Location, and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest attributes, each scoring above 4.25. The university also received a solid rating for its facilities and professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a score of 3.59. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and international appeal.

This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This institution achieves outstanding marks, particularly excelling in Value with a near-perfect score. Professors, Location, and Accomodation also received exceptionally high ratings. Conversely, Internationality is the lowest-rated aspect, alongside Student Life, though still scoring well above average. Facilities also contribute positively to the overall university assessment.

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.

Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, enriching experiences, and good quality teaching. A small portion of feedback (~5%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and practical value.

With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

All 36 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.92/5. Students praise the combination of theory and practice, flexibility of online courses, and dedicated support from trainers and staff for career development.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
50%
33%
30%
71%
92%
50%
4★
54%
42%
52%
43%
21%
8%
50%
3★
5%
7%
11%
20%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
3%
3%
7%
0%
0%
1★
3%
1%
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

A good experience

Very satisfied with my experience at ISCOD. Very fast integration: immediately taken care of by a super-efficient admissions officer, I found my internship in less than a week. The learning platform is very complete. Many relevant resources and tools are made available to us and/or brought to our attention. I didn’t want to go back to school face-to-face and I am particularly satisfied with the autonomy provided by online and digital learning. My learning coach follows me regularly and helps me in the progress of my training as well as in the development of my thesis. He is a professional in the field in which I train and our exchanges are always very enriching. The other students are volunteers and just ask to share and help each other! Thanks to the internship program, I learn much better since I directly apply what I learn. I get paid and school is free. I made the right choice.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close