IÉSEG School of Management vs Université de Lille vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Ecole de Management IFAG
Side-by-side comparison from 472 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Supportive and well-trained faculty
- +Relevant and in-depth programs with ample lab work
- +Abundant opportunities and advanced facilities
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
Nothing to show
- +Expert industry professionals and practical industry exposure
- +Challenging but valuable life sciences education
Nothing to show
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of career support and job prospects
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
Nothing to show
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
This university garners excellent feedback for its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring a high 4.12. Internationality is also well-regarded at 3.98. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating at 3.74, closely followed by **Location** at 3.76. Professors and Value fall within a similar, moderate range.
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its facilities, professors, and internationality, all receiving perfect scores. Student life offers a moderate experience, while its value proposition is highly rated. However, significant drawbacks are evident in its location and accommodation, both of which received zero ratings, indicating these are areas of considerable concern.
Nothing to show
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~84% of feedback), highlighting advanced labs, diverse opportunities, and supportive lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded among the 45 reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's strong life sciences program and industry-experienced professionals. The curriculum is highlighted as valuable, though one review notes it can be stressful.
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
