University of Cyprus - UCY vs Girne American University - GAU vs Global Business University - Europe - GBU vs University of Nicosia - UNIC vs Cyprus International University
Side-by-side comparison from 140 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic standards and quality of faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive environment for growth
- +Modern facilities and engaging learning experiences
- +Supportive and guiding teachers
- +Encouraging and inspiring environment
- +Excellent resources and student life support
- +Helpful and supportive staff
- +Flexible and accessible education
- +Relevant and practical learning
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly professors
- +Practical, case-study-based learning approach
- +Well-organized courses with ample resources
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Study-friendly environment and resources
- +Comprehensive program offerings
Nothing to show
- +Strong professional experience and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student community
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as uninspired and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of support and unclear communication negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Infrequent and limited live sessions.
- -Outdated or insufficient course materials requiring external research.
- -Platform not consistently updated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
Nothing to show
- -Unfair and suspicious grading system, particularly regarding thesis evaluation.
- -Lack of transparency and truthfulness in communication from the university and supervisors.
Among the surveyed aspects, this institution shines brightest in its **Professors** and **Value for Money**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories such as Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation generally fall within a respectable mid-range, suggesting a well-rounded, though not uniformly exceptional, student experience.
This institution receives its highest marks for the quality of its professors, followed closely by its internationality and location. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with the lowest rating. Facilities and student life also received middling scores, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, including Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving strong scores around 4.67. Professors also earned a high mark of 4.67. The university's Facilities and Location received solid ratings of 4, while Accomodation scored slightly higher at 4.33. The weakest area, relative to its highest scores, appears to be Facilities and Location.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Internationality received particularly high marks, indicating excellent academic and global engagement. Location and Value also scored well. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, though Student Life and Accomodation also scored slightly lower than the top categories.
Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Internationality stands out as its strongest area with a rating of 4.4, closely followed by professors at 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring 3.857. Other areas like facilities, location, student life, and value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
Nothing to show
With a solid overall performance, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received high marks, indicating a positive campus environment and convenient surroundings. However, the university's strongest areas are contrasted by lower scores for professors and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in academic support and global engagement. The value also appears to be a weaker point.
All 23 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.22/5. Students highlight enriching academic experiences, knowledgeable professors, modern facilities, and a welcoming atmosphere.
About 70% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teaching staff and a good learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4.67 average rating from three reviews, students highly recommend the university, citing helpful staff and flexible programs. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.
With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly lecturers, a practical learning approach with case studies, and well-organized courses with ample resources. One negative review mentioned insufficient live sessions and outdated platform content.
Students highly recommend this university, praising its study-friendly environment and supportive lecturers who ensure understanding. Excellent services and facilities like a large library and labs also contribute to a positive experience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 2/5, negative feedback (~67%) dominates. Students express dissatisfaction with the grading system, citing unfairness and suspicion. One positive comment highlights valuable professional experience and helpful professors.
-UCY is such a great place for both of foreign and native speakers. -It has many benefits, free books and library -It has different major that you can hardly choose in a good way -It offers greek and english lessons -People are friendly -In the campus you can find literally everything such as cafes,restaurant ~ it's not just seperated buildings. -A good place to rest after studying too
A renounced and progressive university that offers student with the best education and goes beyond and over to help students achieve excellence in their respective departments. An environment that supports and encourages student to strive .
I previously studied for an undergraduate degree with The Cyprus Institute of Marketing (BVI) through a local center in Uganda – Center for International Studies. I then decided to continue my studies in 2017 with a graduate degree and opted to do the MSc in Fraud Auditing
UNIC is indeed UNIQUE in all areas. The lecturers are highly trained professors who are grounded in their respective fields. Apart from being grounded, they are friendly, accommodating and down-to-earth.
While I appreciate the academic environment at my university, a notable drawback for me as a master's student is the limited emphasis on practical projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Instead of fostering a more hands-on approach, the curriculum leans towards examinations, mirroring the structure of undergraduate programs. I believe a greater balance between theoretical assessments and practical application would better prepare us for the demands of our respective fields and enhance the overall learning experienceI recommend that the university reevaluate the structure of the master's program to incorporate more practical elements such as projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Balancing theoretical assessments with hands-on experiences would better align the curriculum with the expectations of advanced-level education, providing master's students with a more comprehensive skill set for their future endeavors.
Nothing to show
I had the worst possible experience during my diploma thesis grading, plus the overall grading system works in a very suspicious way and is totally unfair. My 1st degree is from an Engineering university (5years - integrated master) thus I had high expectations which were proven to be false. Throughout the thesis process, I was repeatedly assured that everything was progressing well. My supervisor gave me the impression that my work met all expectations and that my performance was strong. However, I was surprised and disheartened to receive a final thesis grade of 8/10, which was significantly lower than my average course grades, typically around 9/10. This discrepancy brought down my final degree average to 8.6, which does not reflect the overall quality and consistency of my academic performance. In higher level universities, you are supposed to get your best grade in your best project, which is your thesis, but not on Neapolis Pafos University apparently. Regarding my work, please note that even at my presentation everyone was thrilled about my work (I also answered every question with great success as they mentioned). All 3 supervisors congratulated me and then gave me an 8. I wanted some feedback, and I tried to call my supervisor but he rejected every single one of my calls!! Hilarious. The lack of alignment between the supervisor’s feedback and the final grade raises concerns about fairness and consistency in the grading system.
