EU Business School vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs Swiss School of Higher Education - SSHE vs Rushford Business School vs Alfred Nobel Open Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 337 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Strong global network and personal growth
- +Practical industry experience and diverse opportunities
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Dedicated faculty and personalized guidance
- +Flexible curriculum and structured learning
- +Supportive community and industry connections
- +Flexible study schedules and diverse themes
- +High-quality faculty with global perspectives
- +Relevant MBA programs for career advancement
- +Engaging, real-world focused professors and interactive learning
- +Opportunities for practical application and recognition through competitions
- +Personal growth and boosted confidence
Nothing to show
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling neglected.
- -Lack of promised support and opportunities.
- -Poor post-enrollment communication.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and job placement opportunities are a major concern.
Nothing to show
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Exhibiting particularly strong performance, the university achieved its highest rating in Internationality, followed closely by Facilities and Student Life. Conversely, Location received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Other well-regarded areas include Accomodation, Value, and Professors, all scoring well above average.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths across several key areas. Location stands out as the top-rated aspect. Professors, student life, internationality, and overall value also receive highly positive feedback. Conversely, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities also fall somewhat behind the university's stronger performance metrics.
This institution receives excellent marks, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area, earning a perfect 5. **Professors** also garner high praise at 4.9. **Student Life**, while still strong, is the relatively weakest aspect with a score of 4.4. The university demonstrates a solid all-around performance with high ratings in location, accommodation, internationality, and value.
Remarkably, this institution achieves top scores in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are Professors and Internationality, both earning a perfect 5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value are also highly rated at 4. The only area not explicitly detailed is the weakest, but the consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With an average rating of 4.77/5 from 57 reviews, ~95% highlight positive experiences. Recurring themes include skill development and valuable internships. No negative feedback was reported.
~83% of reviews highlight exceptional faculty, personalized guidance, and a vibrant, collaborative community. Opportunities for internships and industry connections were also praised. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising program flexibility, diverse themes, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions unfulfilled promises and poor communication.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight inspiring professors, interactive classes, and significant personal growth.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
The school have excellent collaboration dynamics between study mayors and external events, Also, excellent personalized guiding assistance in school and potential extra hours mentoring. Looking forward to seeing the amazing results the MBA will bring.
I regret choosing Rushford Business School for my MBA. Despite detailed discussions and assurances from its president, Syed Tufail, none of the promised support or opportunities were delivered. Communication after enrollment was extremely poor, and the overall experience did not meet expectations. Sharing this to help others make informed decisions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
