ESCP Business School vs University of Warsaw - UW vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Lazarski University vs Civitas University

Side-by-side comparison from 303 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Lazarski University (4.50)
ESCP Business School: wins 1/7 categories
University of Warsaw - UW: wins 1/7 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 1/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 3/7 categories
Civitas University: wins 1/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.19
4.25
4.61
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.33
4.37
2.75
4.56
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.30
Professors
4.11
4.45
4.50
4.57
Win
4.21
Not rated
4.10
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.39
4.25
4.63
4.36
Not rated
4.10
Student life
4.17
4.23
4.50
Win
4.46
3.93
Not rated
3.80
Value
4.39
4.46
4.25
4.62
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.30
Accommodation
3.27
4.22
Win
4.00
3.87
3.36
Not rated
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +European campuses and multicultural environment
  • +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
  • +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
  • +High-quality, engaging academic programs with career preparation
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors fostering personal and academic growth
  • +Vibrant student life and attractive campus/location
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
  • -Useless and irrelevant coursework and lack of accessible information.
  • -Underdeveloped course structure with insufficient classes.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.

This institution receives notably high marks across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Value**, closely followed by **Professors**, indicating excellent academic and financial returns. **Location** and **Internationality** also score very well. The weakest, though still respectable, category is **Facilities**. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with notable strengths in academic and financial aspects, with room for improvement primarily in its physical infrastructure.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.

Nearly all ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, excellent professors, and a vibrant student life. A single negative review cited underdeveloped courses and difficulty accessing information.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
45%
33%
64%
57%
0%
40%
4★
38%
44%
50%
27%
29%
0%
40%
3★
5%
10%
17%
8%
7%
0%
10%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
1%
7%
0%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great international exposure

To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.

Wonderful curriculum

Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close