Université d'Orléans vs Excelia Business School vs Polytech Orléans vs SUPINFO Orléans vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 99 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse programs and experienced, friendly professors
- +Affordable tuition and living costs
- +Accessible campus and convenient facilities
- +Diverse, multicultural environment and global opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and practical, well-structured curriculum
- +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
Nothing to show
- +Professionalization and diverse opportunities in computer science
- +Supportive learning environment and personalized pace
- +Mobility and flexible learning formats
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Practical and hands-on learning
- +Study abroad opportunities and international exposure
- +Professional and passionate professors
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or uninspired.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value were disappointing.
- -The program's focus did not align with student expectations or career goals.
- -High tuition costs were not justified by the perceived quality of education and career support.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from instructors and the university is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
This university shows particular strength in accommodation and internationality, both scoring a high 4.3. Other well-regarded areas include facilities, professors, and location, all at 3.8. Student life represents the weakest area with a score of 3.45, though the overall value remains solid at 3.7.
Internationality, Location, and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest attributes, each scoring above 4.25. The university also received a solid rating for its facilities and professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a score of 3.59. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and international appeal.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Its strengths lie in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international focus, and exceptional value for money, all scoring a perfect five. The weakest area, with a rating of three, is the performance of its professors. Facilities are also highly rated at a four.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong academic reputation. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.7, with location and internationality also scoring highly at 4.3. Student life and accommodation are similarly rated at approximately 3.78, while facilities present the weakest area with a score of 3.9. Overall, the university offers good value at 4.2.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from 17 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise diverse programs and reasonable fees, experienced and friendly professors, and affordable student living.
~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, enriching experiences, and good quality teaching. A small portion of feedback (~5%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and practical value.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight ample professional opportunities in computer science and a supportive campus atmosphere. The curriculum effectively fosters professionalization and knowledge diversification.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and beneficial study abroad programs that enhance skills and career prospects. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
I found that the environment is very adaptable and super friendly The Master LAME courses were really interesting and sometimes challenging. However, the language courses promised was not what expected. I hoped for way more especially the french language. Its was definitely not sufficient for someone who is a beginner or intermediate. The other challenge was to get an internship in English..Not easy at all..at all.. Last but not least, the amazing international environment filled with wonderful people from all walks of life.. This definitely made the journey worthwhile.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
Nothing to show
