Université d'Orléans vs Excelia Business School vs Polytech Orléans vs SUPINFO Orléans vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 110 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse programs and experienced, friendly professors
- +Affordable tuition and living costs
- +Accessible campus and convenient facilities
- +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
- +International exposure and multicultural environment.
- +High-quality teaching and good course content.
Nothing to show
- +Professionalization and diverse opportunities in computer science
- +Supportive learning environment and personalized pace
- +Mobility and flexible learning formats
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or uninspired.
- -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
- -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university shows particular strength in accommodation and internationality, both scoring a high 4.3. Other well-regarded areas include facilities, professors, and location, all at 3.8. Student life represents the weakest area with a score of 3.45, though the overall value remains solid at 3.7.
Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Its strengths lie in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international focus, and exceptional value for money, all scoring a perfect five. The weakest area, with a rating of three, is the performance of its professors. Facilities are also highly rated at a four.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4/5 average rating from 17 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise diverse programs and reasonable fees, experienced and friendly professors, and affordable student living.
With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight ample professional opportunities in computer science and a supportive campus atmosphere. The curriculum effectively fosters professionalization and knowledge diversification.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
I found that the environment is very adaptable and super friendly The Master LAME courses were really interesting and sometimes challenging. However, the language courses promised was not what expected. I hoped for way more especially the french language. Its was definitely not sufficient for someone who is a beginner or intermediate. The other challenge was to get an internship in English..Not easy at all..at all.. Last but not least, the amazing international environment filled with wonderful people from all walks of life.. This definitely made the journey worthwhile.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
