IÉSEG School of Management vs Université d'Orléans vs Excelia Business School vs Polytech Orléans vs SUPINFO Orléans
Side-by-side comparison from 334 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Diverse programs and experienced, friendly professors
- +Affordable tuition and living costs
- +Accessible campus and convenient facilities
- +Diverse, multicultural environment and global opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and practical, well-structured curriculum
- +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
Nothing to show
- +Professionalization and diverse opportunities in computer science
- +Supportive learning environment and personalized pace
- +Mobility and flexible learning formats
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
Nothing to show
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or uninspired.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value were disappointing.
- -The program's focus did not align with student expectations or career goals.
- -High tuition costs were not justified by the perceived quality of education and career support.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This university shows particular strength in accommodation and internationality, both scoring a high 4.3. Other well-regarded areas include facilities, professors, and location, all at 3.8. Student life represents the weakest area with a score of 3.45, though the overall value remains solid at 3.7.
Internationality, Location, and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest attributes, each scoring above 4.25. The university also received a solid rating for its facilities and professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a score of 3.59. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and international appeal.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Its strengths lie in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international focus, and exceptional value for money, all scoring a perfect five. The weakest area, with a rating of three, is the performance of its professors. Facilities are also highly rated at a four.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
Nothing to show
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
With a 4/5 average rating from 17 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise diverse programs and reasonable fees, experienced and friendly professors, and affordable student living.
~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, enriching experiences, and good quality teaching. A small portion of feedback (~5%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and practical value.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight ample professional opportunities in computer science and a supportive campus atmosphere. The curriculum effectively fosters professionalization and knowledge diversification.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
I found that the environment is very adaptable and super friendly The Master LAME courses were really interesting and sometimes challenging. However, the language courses promised was not what expected. I hoped for way more especially the french language. Its was definitely not sufficient for someone who is a beginner or intermediate. The other challenge was to get an internship in English..Not easy at all..at all.. Last but not least, the amazing international environment filled with wonderful people from all walks of life.. This definitely made the journey worthwhile.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
