SKEMA Business School vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs Hult International Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Zayed University
Side-by-side comparison from 471 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
- +Diverse student body and global community
- +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
- +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
- +Strong networking and career opportunities
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Supportive and experienced faculty
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Exceptional faculty and academic programs
- +Outstanding facilities and campus environment
- +Strong preparation for the workforce
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Holistic development and practical experience
- +Engaging campus life and facilities
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
- -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
- -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
- -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient materials are a concern.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and teaching methods are disliked.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Poor communication from the institution is a significant source of dissatisfaction.
- -Poor communication, delays, and unprofessional staff lead to a frustrating experience.
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities, such as events and field trips, is a significant drawback.
- -The quality of teaching and faculty experience does not justify the high fees.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.
With high scores across most aspects, this institution excels in **Internationality** (4.79) and **Location** (4.61). Professors also receive strong marks (4.49). The weakest area for the university is **Accomodation**, which received a considerably lower rating (3.29) compared to other surveyed categories. Facilities (4.16), Student Life (4.20), and Value (4.15) fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Professors**, earning a rating of 4.46, closely followed by **Facilities** at 4.43 and **Value** at 4.38. **Student Life** also scores well with 4.35. The **Location** receives the lowest rating at 4.13, while other aspects like Accomodation and Internationality are also solid.
Facilities stand out as the strongest area, earning a high rating. Conversely, Value and Accomodation received the lowest scores among the assessed categories. Student Life and Internationality also performed well, indicating positive student experiences. Professors and Location are rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights excellent career opportunities, networking, and practical learning experiences. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with professor quality and program materials.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Zayed University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise exceptional academic programs, knowledgeable faculty, and outstanding facilities. Minor concerns are virtually absent.
With an average rating of 3.8/5, ~74% of 112 reviews are positive, highlighting approachable faculty and growth opportunities. A small ~7% of feedback noted issues like unprofessionalism and communication delays.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Amity University's Aerospace Engineering bachelor's program offers a comprehensive blend of theoretical knowledge and practical exposure in the field of aviation and aerospace technology. The curriculum is well-structured, covering essential subjects such as aerodynamics, aircraft propulsion, avionics, and space technology. The faculty members are generally supportive and knowledgeable, although some students have noted variations in teaching quality across different courses. The university's infrastructure includes laboratories and research facilities that facilitate learning and experimentation. On the downside, there have been occasional concerns about administrative processes and campus amenities, which could be improved to enhance overall student experience. Another downside is that the university does not provide any form of placements. Additionally, while the program covers a broad spectrum of topics, some students feel that certain specialized areas could be explored in greater depth. In conclusion, Amity University's Aerospace Engineering program provides a solid foundation for students aspiring to enter the aerospace industry. With its practical approach and decent faculty support. Prospective students should consider visiting the campus and researching recent student feedback to make an informed decision about joining the program.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
