Tampere University - TUNI vs Abo Akademi University - AAU vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Hanken School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 116 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and flexible personal study plans
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Well-structured programs with practical application and research opportunities
- +Supportive and helpful faculty/staff
- +Excellent facilities and central location
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse programs
- +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
- +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
- +Strong community support and active student life
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +High teaching quality and experienced lecturers
- +Engaging international environment
- +Helpful support services
- +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
- +Welcoming city & positive student community
- +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects.
- +Industry-relevant programs and career preparation.
- +Innovative, student-centered approach.
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly due to university reforms.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of support and resources hinders academic success and well-being.
- -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient academic support and resources.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content is irrelevant or too theoretical.
The university garners significant acclaim, particularly in **Student Life**, which stands out with a 4.74 rating. **Facilities** also score very highly at 4.63. Areas such as **Accomodation** (4.24), **Professors** (4.26), and **Value** (4.26) show solid performance. **Internationality** is rated at 4.11, and **Location** is the lowest scored category at 4.06, though still strong.
Exceptional ratings paint a picture of a top-tier institution. This university achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No single area stands out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others, as all aspects are consistently rated at the highest level.
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, alongside a strong rating for Value. Accommodations are also well-regarded. However, the university's Internationality score is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for development. The location also received a good, but not perfect, rating.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.
Overall, this university garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in its **Internationality** (5.0), with equally impressive scores for **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** (all 4.5). The **Value** for money is also highly rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a score of 3.5.
With a 4.43 average rating from 35 reviews, approximately 74% praise the inclusive environment, supportive teachers, and flexible study plans. A small portion (~3%) notes declining teaching quality due to university reformation.
Five out of six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the supportive environment, helpful staff, and excellent infrastructure.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised for its excellent teaching quality and strong international environment. Positive feedback highlights engaging academics and helpful support services.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, the two reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-relevant education and hands-on learning experiences. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
