Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs HELBUS Helsinki School of Business vs University of Eastern Finland
Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous, independent learning with practical, hands-on experience
- +Active student life, community support, and multidisciplinary collaboration
- +Flexible course options and excellent facilities
- +Strong sense of community and support
- +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
- +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +Personalized guidance and support for academic progress
- +Motivating and helpful staff
- +Opportunities for quick graduation
- +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
- +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
- +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
- +High-quality education and strong programs, especially in ICT and wireless technology.
- +Supportive and international learning environment with modern facilities.
- +Good city life, student culture, and career preparation support.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is concerning.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching staff create a negative academic experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of effective teaching and engaging curriculum is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
With a generally strong showing across multiple aspects, this university excels in **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.39. **Internationality** and **Value** also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 4.06. The university demonstrates robust performance in student-focused categories like **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, while **Professors** also maintain a solid score.
The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
Exceptional scores were awarded across every aspect of the university. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas, suggesting a consistently high-quality educational environment.
This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.
This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** is also a strong point. Conversely, the **Location** is the weakest area, indicating potential drawbacks in this aspect. **Student Life** and **Internationality** show moderate performance, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a vibrant campus experience and a more global outlook.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting strong academic challenges, independent learning, and active student life with multidisciplinary opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~8%) suggests courses may be too short to fully grasp topics.
Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights helpful staff, advice, opportunities, and motivational support. No negative feedback was reported.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.
All 7 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the high-quality education, excellent facilities, and supportive, international environment, particularly in ICT and health tech. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Nothing to show
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
This school was very good and helpful, I wanted to graduate quickly and they have helped me achieve this, they gave me advice and opportunities and they were checking in on my progress. Very motivating to be surrounded by the staff.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
