Boise State University vs Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ vs ITMO University vs Newcastle University Business School vs Bilecik University - BSEU

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Boise State University (5.00)
Boise State University: wins 2/5 categories
Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana - UCSJ: wins 2/5 categories
ITMO University: wins 0/5 categories
Newcastle University Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Bilecik University - BSEU: wins 0/5 categories
University of Iceland - HÍ: wins 1/5 categories
Reykjavik University - RU: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Boise, Idaho, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Humanities
Saint Petersburg, Russia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Newcastle, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
17 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Business
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Reykjavik, Iceland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.47
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
4.53
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
3.00
4.50
Win
4.00
4.24
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
2.00
2.50
3.00
4.47
3.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Student life
5.00
3.50
5.00
4.53
1.00
3.50
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
4.18
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
1.00
3.00
4.12
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and experienced professors
  • +Active campus life with clubs and activities
  • +Strong humanities and arts foundation.
  • +Excellent, specialized programs like gastronomy.
  • +Focus on humanistic skills and free thinking.
  • +Supportive community and project collaboration
  • +Specialized learning pathways
  • +Focus on practical skills
  • +Strong academic programs with real-world application
  • +Passionate and supportive professors
  • +Practical skill development and well-structured curriculum

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences.
  • +High quality of higher education.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and clear guidance is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and guidance impacts student success and well-being.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & poor technology
  • -Lack of career support & guidance

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication and transparency from the institution are lacking.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional strengths are evident in its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2. The university also garners a solid 4 for **Value** and a respectable 3 for its **Professors**.

This institution receives strong commendations for its **professors** and **value**, both scoring a high 4.5. Facilities and location also received favorable ratings of 4. Student life is rated a respectable 3.5, while internationality stands at 2.5. The most significant area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a low score of 1.

This institution shines in key areas, particularly its excellent facilities and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. Professors and location also garner strong positive feedback. However, areas for improvement include accommodation, which scored moderately, and internationality, also receiving a middling rating. Overall, the university offers good value.

This university garners strong marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Location and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.53. Facilities and Internationality also perform very well, each at 4.47. On the other hand, Accomodation and Value received slightly lower, though still solid, scores of 4.12 and 4.18 respectively. Professors are rated highly at 4.24, rounding out a generally positive assessment.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accomodation**, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are areas with the lowest scores, both at 3.5, suggesting room for improvement in these domains.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students highlight strong CS professors and a vibrant campus with many activities. Racial diversity is noted as low.

All reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight excellent programs and teachers in areas like Art History and Human Sciences, valuing the focus on humanistic skills and international recognition, particularly in gastronomy.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university is highly praised (~100% positive feedback). Students highlight a strong community and project collaboration opportunities. Theory quality varies by specialization.

Most reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.35/5. Students praise academic excellence, real-world application, passionate professors, and well-structured, practical programs. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight practical work and the university's quality. A minor concern involves mandatory Icelandic subjects in some specializations.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
67%
0%
47%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
33%
100%
41%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
12%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A Future with more cheers!

Reading about the school, I was impressed by the attention they claim to give the students, their ranking amongst top universities and the business school facilitators plus the partnering bodies. I was also intrigued by the data lab and how their research are always towards the betterment of society and humanity. I was not shocked to resume school and see all these, first hand; I am proud to be part of NUBS story! The classrooms are standard and environmentally friendly, the campus is aesthetically beautiful and has a story to tell. The reception is almost like a friendly work station and I love how my desk replicates an office setting making me feel at home and not like a child resuming school. I resumed late and had my supervisors and students helping me catch up with a friendly team that I could reach out to without fear or remorse. It sure is a great place to school and work.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close