Technical University of Dortmund - TU Dortmund vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences vs International School of Management (ISM)
Side-by-side comparison from 154 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive staff and international environment
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Well-structured programs and helpful guidance
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Practical, hands-on curriculum and industry relevance
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +International environment and practical career preparation
- +High-quality lectures and academic planning
- +Diverse assessment methods
- +Opportunities for holistic student development
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
- +Strong international business programs
- +Positive semester abroad opportunities
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt operations and student support.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency causes confusion and frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Students are dissatisfied with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its Facilities, receiving a perfect 5. Areas of notable strength also include Internationality at 4.8 and Professors and Location, both rated 4.6. Conversely, Student Life and Accomodation are rated a respectable 4, representing the areas with the lowest scores in this assessment.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Overall, this university garners excellent scores across most categories. Its strongest areas are internationality and value, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded. Facilities, location, and student life are rated very well. The weakest area is accommodation, which falls significantly below other metrics.
This institution performs exceptionally well in its teaching staff, earning a strong 4.5 for professors. Its facilities, location, internationality, and overall value also receive respectable scores of 3.5. Student life is rated moderately at 3. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities are also highly rated, indicating a positive student experience. Conversely, the university's performance in professor quality and accommodation received moderate scores, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight rewarding academics, approachable professors, a supportive international environment, and well-equipped facilities.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
All 5 reviews were positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlighted practical, hands-on education, approachable faculty, and good career preparation. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, approximately 50% are positive. Students highlight strong academic planning, lectures, and assessments for enhancing learning. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests a good experience, with no negative comments recorded.
Nothing to show
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
