University of Ljubljana vs University of Primorska vs Los Angeles Valley College - LAVC vs DOBA Business School vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU

Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: DOBA Business School (5.00)
University of Ljubljana: wins 0/7 categories
University of Primorska: wins 0/7 categories
Los Angeles Valley College - LAVC: wins 0/7 categories
DOBA Business School: wins 3/7 categories
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 4/7 categories
University of Maribor: wins 0/7 categories
IEDC-Bled School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Ljubljana, Slovenia
4.20
Read more reviews
49 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Communication and Media
Los Angeles, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Maribor, Slovenia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Social Media
Best programme: Computer Science
Maribor, Slovenia
4.30
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Professors
3.99
3.50
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
4.17
Not rated
Internationality
3.40
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.43
2.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
4.17
Not rated
Value
4.19
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
3.83
Not rated
Accommodation
3.74
3.50
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
3.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Well-structured and challenging academic programs
  • +Human-centered approach and personal focus on students
  • +Dedicated professors and small class sizes
  • +Holistic skill development and practical learning
  • +Strong international student support and English-speaking faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible online learning and work-life balance
  • +Ample job opportunities post-graduation
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities
  • +Personal learning environment and professor accessibility
  • +Balance of theory and practical skills
  • +International student community and English-taught programs

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Limited campus integration and lack of social cohesion between faculties.
  • -Uninspired and unchallenging academic work, including assignments and exams.
  • -Lack of program development and outdated course content.
  • -Overemphasis on marketing and external recognition rather than academic substance.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clarity and poor communication are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and insufficient support for learning are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student experience metrics reveal a university excelling in certain aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, closely followed by Student Life. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest score. Other areas like Professors and Value also received strong marks, while Facilities and Accomodation fall in the mid-range of ratings.

This institution performs exceptionally well in terms of its **location**, earning a high 4.5 rating. Its **facilities** and **internationality** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. Students can expect a solid experience regarding **professors** and **accommodation**, with average ratings of 3.5. The university offers good **value** at 3. However, **student life** is a notable area for improvement, receiving a comparatively low score of 2.5.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks, with top scores for its prime location, vibrant student life, and high level of internationality. Facilities, professors, and accommodation are also rated positively. The sole area receiving a slightly lower rating, though still strong, is value, suggesting areas for potential enhancement within the student experience.

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Generally, this institution demonstrates strong performance in key areas. Its strongest aspects are the quality of its professors and the vibrancy of its student life, both receiving excellent scores. The university also fares well in location and internationality. However, its facilities and accommodation are areas where improvement could be considered, as they received the lowest ratings. The overall value for students is also quite good.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 49 reviews, approximately 98% are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors, well-structured courses, and a welcoming environment. One negative review mentioned less challenging assignments and exams.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, most students found the university a good place to study, highlighting dedicated professors and strong faculty for technical and artistic development. A smaller portion felt the institution prioritized marketing over program improvement.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. The single positive review highlights flexibility for balancing study with work and good future job prospects.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 from six reviews, ~100% are positive. Students value the personal learning environment, knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, and a good balance of theory and practical skills across diverse programs.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
27%
33%
0%
100%
50%
33%
0%
4★
67%
33%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
3★
4%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
2%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great academic quality

The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close