Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Estácio vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs Fluminense Federal University - UFF vs Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM (5.00)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 0/5 categories
Estácio: wins 1/5 categories
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ: wins 0/5 categories
Fluminense Federal University - UFF: wins 1/5 categories
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: wins 0/5 categories
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro: wins 2/5 categories
Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.10
Read more reviews
31 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Criminology and Law
Category ratings
Facilities
3.06
3.97
3.25
3.71
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
3.44
4.03
4.00
4.88
Win
4.00
3.50
4.00
Professors
4.33
4.17
4.75
4.25
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.22
3.23
3.50
3.25
4.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Student life
3.41
3.86
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.50
Win
4.00
Value
4.56
3.70
4.00
4.63
4.00
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.88
3.42
Win
3.25
2.75
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality faculty and learning opportunities
  • +Diverse extracurricular and research options
  • +Strong industry connections and career preparation
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +Efficient and helpful student support
  • +User-friendly online platform and good infrastructure
  • +Excellent and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Strong academic and career opportunities
  • +Great infrastructure and accessible campus
  • +Well-regarded and comprehensive academic programs
  • +Dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +Opportunities and support for diverse student needs
  • +Highly qualified faculty and diverse educational techniques
  • +Freedom to explore various areas of knowledge
  • +Excellent teaching and professor support
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Wide course variety
  • +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
  • +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
  • +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on financial gain over student care.
  • -Lack of adequate support and clear communication, especially for online learners.
  • -Inconsistent teaching methods and poor organization within courses.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
  • -Communication gaps and a perceived lack of support create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of adequate resources and support
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates significant strengths in Value, with a near-perfect rating. Professors and Internationality also received commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Facilities and Student Life received moderate ratings.

Professors and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.0. Student life and facilities also performed well, indicating positive aspects in campus experience and resources. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation and internationality, which received the lowest scores in the evaluation. The overall value of the university is rated at a respectable 3.7.

Professorial expertise stands out significantly, with an impressive 4.75 rating. Location and student life are also well-regarded, both receiving a 4 and 3.5 respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are areas with the lowest scores, averaging 3.25. The university demonstrates a solid overall value at 4.

This institution performs exceptionally well in terms of **Location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the lowest-scoring area, indicating room for improvement. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** received moderate reviews, suggesting a solid but not outstanding experience in these aspects.

Overall, the university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. It particularly excels in the **Professors** category, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** all received strong marks at 4 out of 5. The lowest rating was for **Accomodation** at 3, indicating this area might benefit from further development. The **Value** proposition is also rated positively at 4.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas such as professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect or near-perfect marks. Value for money is also a standout strength. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, while facilities and location fall in the mid-range. Overall, it offers a highly regarded academic and social experience.

This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most (95%) of reviews are positive, praising rich content, research focus, and numerous opportunities. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods.

Approximately 80% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, student support, and online platforms. A small percentage of feedback (about 10%) mentions institutional financial focus and lack of support.

With a 4.25 average rating from 4 reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent, knowledgeable teachers and good infrastructure, with recognition for academic competence. Some note facilities, like bathrooms, need maintenance and improved ventilation in rooms.

Most (~88%) reviews are positive, highlighting good course variety, academic rigor, and support for students. No negative feedback was reported among the 8 reviews.

Based on one review, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights qualified faculty and a conducive campus environment. Infrastructure and scholarship incentives were noted for improvement.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students praise the university's great teachers, diverse courses, and supportive professors. The calm, safe environment and inclusive atmosphere are also highlighted, with no negative feedback recorded.

This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.

Rating distribution
5★
37%
45%
25%
25%
0%
50%
100%
4★
53%
35%
75%
63%
100%
50%
0%
3★
11%
10%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close