Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs Fluminense Federal University - UFF vs Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio vs Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 0/3 categories
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ: wins 0/3 categories
Fluminense Federal University - UFF: wins 0/3 categories
Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio: wins 0/3 categories
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro: wins 1/3 categories
Instituto Federal Fluminense: wins 2/3 categories
Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Best programme: Agriculture
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Physical Education
Best programme: Criminology and Law
Category ratings
Facilities
3.20
3.00
3.67
4.40
4.00
5.00
5.00
Location
3.53
3.67
5.00
5.00
3.50
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.40
4.67
4.29
4.60
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.27
3.33
3.43
4.60
5.00
Win
4.00
2.00
Student life
3.57
3.00
3.71
4.60
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.60
3.67
4.71
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.00
2.67
2.57
3.50
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
  • +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
  • +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong career opportunities and project encouragement
  • +Good laboratories and infrastructure, despite some facility issues
  • +Highly regarded programs and diverse course offerings
  • +Support for students and accessible opportunities
  • +Qualified faculty and research focus
  • +Excellent professors and robust academic content
  • +Welcoming environment and opportunities for growth
  • +Promising professional prospects and good organization
  • +Excellent teaching and professor support
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Wide course variety
  • +New facilities and resources
  • +Enjoyable learning experience
  • +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
  • +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
  • +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency creates uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of communication and unsupportive staff create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of adequate resources and support
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest area is consistently Professors, receiving an excellent score. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point. Other aspects such as Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately, while Location and Value show solid performance. Internationality also scores mid-range.

This institution receives its highest marks for **Location**, scoring a perfect 5. **Value** also stands out with a strong rating of 4.71. Conversely, **Accomodation** is a notable weak point, receiving the lowest score at 2.57. Ratings for **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Facilities** are generally positive, while **Internationality** falls in the middle range.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, with Location and Value both achieving a perfect 5. Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also stand out with strong ratings of 4.6. Facilities are well-regarded at 4.4. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, which received the lowest score of 3.5.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas such as professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect or near-perfect marks. Value for money is also a standout strength. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, while facilities and location fall in the mid-range. Overall, it offers a highly regarded academic and social experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. The university also boasts a strong international presence, indicated by its high rating in that category. While overall performance is outstanding, a slightly lower score in internationality suggests this is an area with room for further enhancement.

This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring positive themes include excellent teachers and good infrastructure. Some minor concerns were raised about room ventilation and bathroom conditions.

With an average rating of 4.14/5, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent courses, research opportunities, and support programs. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star reviews.

With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 5 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors, great facilities, and academic/professional growth opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students praise the university's great teachers, diverse courses, and supportive professors. The calm, safe environment and inclusive atmosphere are also highlighted, with no negative feedback recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights a positive learning experience, particularly with newly established courses and facilities.

This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.

Rating distribution
5★
44%
33%
29%
60%
50%
100%
100%
4★
56%
67%
57%
40%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close