EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs United International Business Schools - UIBS vs La Salle U.R.L. vs ESIC Business & Marketing School
Side-by-side comparison from 393 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and globally recognized programs with relevant, real-world insights.
- +Supportive and experienced professors fostering engaging discussions and personal connections.
- +Vibrant international community and engaging campus life.
- +Practical learning & industry expert professors
- +Real-world application & career opportunities
- +Vibrant student life & global diversity
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Engaging, proactive, and technology-focused learning methods
- +Strong academic content and knowledgeable faculty
- +practical, project-based learning with real companies
- +excellent teaching quality from industry professionals
- +strong academic and personal support from staff
- +Flexible online learning format
- +Comprehensive and relevant curriculum
- +Efficient support and accessible materials
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Administrative and communication issues cause significant disruption.
- -Program content and promises are not consistently delivered.
- -Arbitrary grading and lack of flexibility are recurring frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues create disorganization and unhelpful staff.
- -The educational quality is basic, with little support for extracurriculars and outdated facilities.
- -The university is perceived as a business focused on profit over student education and well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Outdated curriculum and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of forward-thinking and innovative educational approach.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support, particularly for international students.
- -Misleading information regarding course delivery and lack of proper orientation.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
This institution garners impressive scores in most surveyed areas, with **location** standing out as a clear strength, achieving a near-perfect rating. **Internationality** and **facilities** also received very high marks, indicating excellent resources and global reach. Conversely, **accommodation** is the weakest area, though still rated positively. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its environment and student experience, with room for improvement in housing options.
This university excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received favorable ratings. The **weakest area** for the institution is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. **Value** and **Professors** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas with room for improvement.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Outstanding scores are evident for this university's **Location** (5), **Facilities** (4.67), and **Student Life** (4.67). Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.33. Other areas like Accomodation (4.33), Internationality (4), and Value (4) are rated positively.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Facilities** emerging as its strongest asset at 4.1. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 3.8. Areas rated lower include **Internationality** at 3.5 and **Accomodation** and **Value**, both at 3.6, representing opportunities for improvement. Student life and location also fall within a solid, though not outstanding, range.
This university garners excellent feedback, particularly in its **location**, which received the highest score. Professors and facilities also earned strong marks. While overall student life and internationality are well-regarded, **accommodation** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still positive, rating. The value proposition is considered perfect.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~95%), praising academic quality, experienced professors, and international atmosphere. A small percentage (~3%) of negative feedback mentioned administrative issues and concerns about program content delivery.
Most reviews (around 74%) are positive, highlighting practical learning and industry-expert professors. A smaller portion (~8.3%) of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and basic education.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Nearly 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting internationality, relevant projects, and technology focus. One review (~17%) criticizes outdated architectural programs and facilities.
With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 54 reviews, ~85% are positive, highlighting complete degrees, practical projects with companies, and quality teaching. A very small amount (~2%) of feedback was negative.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.78/5. Students highly recommend ENEB for its flexibility, comprehensive curriculum, and valuable additional courses.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
My time at EADA is something I'll look back on with a big smile. The classes were well paced and the professors were great, not just as teachers but as people. They'd share their own real world experiences which made everything feel much more grounded and useful. Campus life was a lot of fun. Between the events, the outdoor activities and the people you meet across programs, you find your people pretty quickly. EADA has this big family energy that's hard to describe but very easy to feel. And it doesn't stop when you graduate either. The alumni network is genuinely one of the best parts, people actually stay connected and look out for each other. I'd recommend it without hesitation.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
I highly recommend the Master’s in Project Management course at ENEB for anyone considering a career in this field. The course is entirely online, making it convenient for those with busy schedules, and it includes valuable additional courses like Business English and specialized modules from Harvard Business School. The quality of the material is veri high and very comprehensive, providing a strong foundation for beginner project managers or those who are just starting to explore this field. It’s also well-suited for small business owners looking to develop strategic planning skills. Overall, a great choice for gaining practical, applicable knowledge in project management!
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
