Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs University of Eastern Finland
Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Independent learning, flexibility, and practical, hands-on experiences
- +Strong sense of community, readily available support, and active student life
- +Excellent facilities and multidisciplinary, diverse course opportunities
- +Passionate and supportive educators
- +Practical, career-focused, and well-structured programs
- +International and friendly learning environment
- +Supportive environment and approachable staff
- +Practical, business-focused curriculum with real-world application
- +International community and diverse learning experiences
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
- +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
- +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
- +Real-world application and hands-on learning
- +Approachable and invested staff/faculty
- +Modern technology and facilities
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt learning.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder progress.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a consistent complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unresponsive management create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff leads to confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Instruction and curriculum are sometimes perceived as ineffective or lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
This institution demonstrates a solid reputation across multiple facets. Areas like Facilities and Student Life received particularly high marks. Internationality and Value also stood out positively. While still strong, Professors were rated slightly lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for students.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Its Facilities and Internationality are also highly regarded, alongside a strong showing for Value. Conversely, Accomodation is rated slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly in areas directly related to learning and global engagement.
Exceptional marks are awarded for its **location** (4.86) and **internationality** (4.75), showcasing significant strengths. **Facilities** also score highly at 4.38. Conversely, **professors** represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.63. **Student life** (3.86) and **accommodation** (3.88) are moderately rated, while **value** sits at a respectable 4.13.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.
This institution generally receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Facilities** also stand out with a 4.5 rating. The weakest area identified is **Student Life**, which received a 4. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid reputation in academic and material aspects, with student experience being a notable area for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92%), with students praising flexible learning, excellent facilities, and active student life. A few reviewers mentioned that courses sometimes lack depth.
With all 25 reviews being positive, students praise supportive and passionate teachers, practical and career-focused programs, and a rewarding academic experience. An average rating of 4.88/5 reflects this strong satisfaction.
With a 4.22/5 average, ~88% of reviews are positive, praising supportive staff, international programs, and practical business learning. Some students desire more social and extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.
All 6 university reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the dynamic learning environment, real-world application focus, and hands-on guidance from approachable staff.
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
Nothing to show
The study modules are categorized sensibly and connected with each other. The lecturers speak english well, eager to explain to students what they know after many years of working on the field. The campus in Riihimäki is small but has enough equipment for studying and doing thesis work (as I am doing now).
Nothing to show
