Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Hanken School of Economics vs HELBUS Helsinki School of Business vs Häme University of Applied Sciences - HAMK
Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous, independent learning with practical, hands-on experience
- +Active student life, community support, and multidisciplinary collaboration
- +Flexible course options and excellent facilities
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +High teaching quality and experienced lecturers
- +Engaging international environment
- +Helpful support services
- +Personalized guidance and support for academic progress
- +Motivating and helpful staff
- +Opportunities for quick graduation
- +Applied learning and hands-on experience
- +Supportive and approachable staff and faculty
- +High-tech facilities and resources
Nothing to show
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is concerning.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching staff create a negative academic experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent course quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
With a generally strong showing across multiple aspects, this university excels in **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.39. **Internationality** and **Value** also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 4.06. The university demonstrates robust performance in student-focused categories like **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, while **Professors** also maintain a solid score.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, alongside a strong rating for Value. Accommodations are also well-regarded. However, the university's Internationality score is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for development. The location also received a good, but not perfect, rating.
Exceptional scores were awarded across every aspect of the university. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas, suggesting a consistently high-quality educational environment.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple facets. The strongest areas include Value, marked at 4.71, and Facilities, with a rating of 4.5. Professors also receive a high mark at 4.57. Student Life, rated at 4, stands as the relatively weakest point among the surveyed categories, though still a solid score. Other areas like Location and Accomodation also reflect positive feedback.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting strong academic challenges, independent learning, and active student life with multidisciplinary opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~8%) suggests courses may be too short to fully grasp topics.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised for its excellent teaching quality and strong international environment. Positive feedback highlights engaging academics and helpful support services.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights helpful staff, advice, opportunities, and motivational support. No negative feedback was reported.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight HAMK's dynamic, supportive learning environment, real-world application strategies, and hands-on guidance from approachable faculty.
Nothing to show
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
This school was very good and helpful, I wanted to graduate quickly and they have helped me achieve this, they gave me advice and opportunities and they were checking in on my progress. Very motivating to be surrounded by the staff.
The study modules are categorized sensibly and connected with each other. The lecturers speak english well, eager to explain to students what they know after many years of working on the field. The campus in Riihimäki is small but has enough equipment for studying and doing thesis work (as I am doing now).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
