Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs Estonian Business School - EBS vs Häme University of Applied Sciences - HAMK
Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
- +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
- +Strong community support and active student life
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
- +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
- +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Applied learning and hands-on experience
- +Supportive and approachable staff and faculty
- +High-tech facilities and resources
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient academic support and resources.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent course quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple facets. The strongest areas include Value, marked at 4.71, and Facilities, with a rating of 4.5. Professors also receive a high mark at 4.57. Student Life, rated at 4, stands as the relatively weakest point among the surveyed categories, though still a solid score. Other areas like Location and Accomodation also reflect positive feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight HAMK's dynamic, supportive learning environment, real-world application strategies, and hands-on guidance from approachable faculty.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
Nothing to show
The study modules are categorized sensibly and connected with each other. The lecturers speak english well, eager to explain to students what they know after many years of working on the field. The campus in Riihimäki is small but has enough equipment for studying and doing thesis work (as I am doing now).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
