Paris School of Business - PSB vs IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global
Side-by-side comparison from 575 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality teaching and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming environment with engaging activities
- +Excellent facilities and well-maintained campus
- +Excellent campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong international community and engaging professors
- +Well-structured, competitive programs with real-world application
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for professional development and real-world experience
- +Strong academic programs and supportive resources
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Lack of student support and feedback mechanisms are frustrating.
- -Last-minute changes create scheduling difficulties.
- -Lack of professor engagement and effort in improving classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Lack of practical value in coursework and insufficient learning.
- -Frustrating and unfair grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program management.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, with Professors and Internationality tied for the highest rating. Location and Value also score well, indicating a generally positive student experience. Student Life and Facilities are rated solidly, while Accommodations emerge as the weakest performing category, suggesting room for improvement in that specific aspect of the university.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in **Internationality** (4.56) and **Student Life** (4.45). **Location** also scores highly (4.42). The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.93, while **Facilities** are slightly above this at 4.16. **Professors** and **Value** are rated competitively around 4.28 and 4.32 respectively.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in both **Internationality** (4.59) and **Location** (4.57), indicating excellent global engagement and a desirable setting. **Value** for money is also highly rated (4.41). The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring the lowest at 3.94, though other aspects like Student Life (4.25) and Facilities (4.15) remain solid. Professors also receive a respectable rating of 4.06.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
~91% of reviews are positive, praising quality teaching, supportive faculty, and a welcoming campus environment. Excellent facilities and engaging activities are frequently mentioned. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 256 reviews, approximately 99.2% are positive, praising campus life, international environment, and engaging classes. Very limited negative feedback notes concerns about course content and scheduling changes.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), praising academic rigor, practical application, and international diversity. A small percentage (~2%) expressed disappointment with course content and grading fairness.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
It is an amazing University We get to meet people from different cultures. It's well maintained Professors are student-friendly they help us in all sorts of things related to our program and career The location is pretty good as well as it is situated in the center of Paris and really close to the Eiffel tower
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
