The University of Manchester vs Alliance Manchester Business School vs Salford Business School vs UCFB vs Mellor Financial Training

Side-by-side comparison from 367 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Salford Business School (4.60)
The University of Manchester: wins 0/7 categories
Alliance Manchester Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Salford Business School: wins 3/7 categories
UCFB: wins 2/7 categories
Mellor Financial Training: wins 0/7 categories
Business Consort: wins 0/7 categories
Bywater: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
322 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: International Management
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Football Business and Finance
Manchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Manchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.52
Win
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.51
4.60
4.44
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.24
3.90
4.56
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.56
4.76
Win
4.56
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.39
4.32
4.22
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.13
4.10
4.56
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.69
3.86
3.94
Win
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive academic staff.
  • +Positive campus culture and diverse student community.
  • +Excellent career prospects and research opportunities.
  • +Expert, passionate instructors and well-structured, relevant courses.
  • +Real-world experience through consulting projects.
  • +Strong student support and career preparation resources.
  • +Excellent academic and pastoral support
  • +High-quality, practical courses with state-of-the-art facilities
  • +Flexible and supportive environment for learning and development
  • +Industry-focused career opportunities and practical experience
  • +Supportive faculty and helpful guest speakers
  • +State-of-the-art facilities and location

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated and non-functional facilities hinder practical learning.
  • -Unorganized course structures and poor communication from professors are issues.
  • -Lecturers' focus on personal research over relevant course content is a concern.
  • -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant course content
  • -Inadequate facilities and poor infrastructure
  • -Insufficient teaching time due to project focus
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content and teaching methods.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners praise for its internationality and location, both receiving top marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. However, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors and overall value are rated moderately well, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these domains.

The university garners exceptional ratings for its Internationality (4.76) and Location (4.59), indicating strengths in these aspects. Facilities also received a high score (4.50). Conversely, Accomodation (3.83) and Professors (3.93) received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student Life (4.34) and Value (4.08) fall in the middle range.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its facilities, professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.5 or higher. Student life and location are also strong points, rated at 4.22 and 4.44 respectively. Accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.94.

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths. Its location is a standout feature, earning a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, and student life are all highly rated at 4.5. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement. Internationality and overall value also show solid, positive ratings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.26/5, ~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising academics, helpful staff, and campus life. Negative feedback (~1.2%) occasionally mentions course organization or administrative issues.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable instructors, relevant coursework, and career support. A small portion of feedback points to issues with program structure and facilities.

All 18 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight supportive staff and high-quality courses equipped for real-world situations.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from six reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight state-of-the-art facilities, career opportunities in the sports industry, and helpful faculty. One reviewer noted a desire for more industry networking guidance and better community integration for some student groups.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
52%
56%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
48%
24%
44%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Practical

The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.

Nothing to show

QUALITY OF EDUCATION

University of Salford has one of the best standards and quality of education. Their courses are of high quality and they offer very good programmes.My time with the school has been very good as they are supportive in all areas of need and the school is very flexible in times of financial and academic challenges.

Lack of ACS

There has been a major increase in the number of African students that have enrolled in the last year but many of us have failed to establish a sense of community amongst ourselves. I can say that Uni life has not been easy to navigate and not having a village of people who are like me has been tough so I can only imagine what someone else is going through. I think the Uni needs to integrate an ACS for students like me, to know that they have people who they can rely on as well as provide an escape from what can be an overwhelming work life

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close