De Montfort University - DMU vs Almaty Management University - ALMA vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University vs University of Central Asia

Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: De Montfort University - DMU (4.10)
De Montfort University - DMU: wins 0/7 categories
Almaty Management University - ALMA: wins 1/7 categories
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 6/7 categories
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Central Asia: wins 0/7 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
International Information Technologies University - IITU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Leicester, The United Kingdom
4.10
Top
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Best programme: Marketing and Advertising
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.35
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.07
3.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.30
2.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.33
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.12
3.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.13
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging professors with subject passion and practical teaching
  • +Strong academic quality and research opportunities
  • +Supportive learning environment with industry connections and extracurriculars
  • +Experienced and engaging professors
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor academic quality and lack of progression to higher education.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful faculty, with vague or harsh feedback.
  • -Technical issues with submitting work.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With a generally positive evaluation, this university excels in its **Location** (4.35) and **Student Life** (4.33). **Facilities** also received a high score (4.32), closely followed by **Internationality** (4.30). While **Accomodation** (4.13) and **Value** (4.12) are still solid, **Professors** (4.07) represent the lowest-rated aspect among the surveyed categories.

Regarding university ratings, student life stands out as a significant strength, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation presents a notable weakness with a low rating. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are rated moderately. Location receives a strong positive score, while internationality is somewhat lower.

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic quality, engaging professors, and great facilities. A small amount of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions challenges with accessibility and feedback quality for some courses.

With one positive review and no negative feedback, the university receives an average rating of 3.5/5. This suggests a generally positive student experience, with ~50% of feedback being positive and ~0% negative.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
37%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
45%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Unorganised mess of course and uni

Regrettably, I cannot offer a recommendation for Comic and Concept art due to the following reasons: Firstly, the accessibility of the teachers proved to be quite challenging as they were unresponsive to multiple email attempts throughout the entire year. Moreover, the feedback provided was often overly vague and lacked constructive criticism, occasionally even being unnecessarily harsh. In some instances, no feedback was given at all. Submitting work was frequently an arduous task, as specific file formats were required that were incompatible with the content, such as demanding PDFs for documents that couldn't be formatted accordingly and were subsequently rejected. Furthermore, the lessons themselves were lacking in quality. Some lecturers would digress into unrelated topics, consuming valuable class time. The teaching approach was disappointingly minimal, with students being assigned tasks without any guidance or instructional techniques provided. If feedback was given, it was generally unhelpfully brief, merely stating that improvements were needed. The learning materials provided during the lessons were also subpar. Often, we were presented with pre-recorded 10-minute videos and expected to navigate our own way through the material. This lack of effort on the part of the lecturers was unfair and disheartening, making it challenging for students to invest their own efforts. The workload imposed on students was excessive and overwhelming, leading to the majority falling behind. Consequently, many students experienced a negative impact on their mental well-being, ultimately resulting in some dropping out. Additionally, the university failed to provide necessary information about the course, leaving students to rely on each other for essential details. Timetables and key information, including student cards, were significantly delayed without any valid explanation. Technological tools such as email, Blackboard, Teams, and attendance systems frequently malfunctioned, causing further frustration and hindrance to the learning experience. Tragically, instances of bullying were pervasive both within the classroom and online, including incidents targeting vulnerable individuals. Despite reporting these matters to the course leader, no action could be taken without the full names of the involved students, which was a requirement I couldn't fulfill. Regrettably, when I brought these concerns to the attention of the class representatives, they chose to ignore my pleas for assistance. Lastly, living in Leicester City proved to be unsafe, with prevalent cases of sexual harassment, homophobic and transphobic threats. Disturbingly, both the police and the university failed to take any meaningful action in response to these issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close