ESERP Business School vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs Barcelona School of Economics - BSE vs INESDI Digital Business School - Barcelona vs Neuro Business School - NBS
Side-by-side comparison from 221 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical learning & real-world application
- +Strong marketing & business programmes
- +Supportive environment & professional development
- +Excellent teaching quality and helpful professors.
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities.
- +Supportive environment with good student welfare and flexible academic options.
- +High-quality teaching and research
- +Strong career prospects and CV recognition
- +Global environment and excellent Barcelona location
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with industry practice
- +Practical and hands-on learning approach
- +Personalized student attention and career development support
- +International environment and diverse perspectives
- +Practical application of neuroscience to business challenges
- +Engaging and insightful learning with relevant skills
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- +Engaging and supportive instructors
- +Practical and relevant course content
- +Strong community and peer support
- -Poor management, organization, and academic support.
- -Outdated and low-quality facilities.
- -Deceptive marketing and unclear policies regarding student work.
- -Excessive difficulty and perceived unfairness in grading contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are frequently mentioned.
- -A lack of clear communication and support is a significant concern.
- -administrative & management issues
- -poor communication and transparency
- -difficulties with financial processes
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
This university receives excellent marks for its **location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Internationality** also stands out as a strength. Conversely, **student life** is identified as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. While **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** are all rated well, **accommodation** is considered average.
Across a range of surveyed categories, this university demonstrates strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.09. **Professors** also received a high mark at 3.97. Conversely, the **Location** and **Internationality** scores are relatively lower, both hovering around 3.75, indicating these areas might be considered for improvement. Overall, the institution maintains a solid standing in its facilities, student life, and accommodation.
Outstanding marks were achieved in many areas, with perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Location, Accomodation, and Internationality. Value also received a top rating. Student Life, while still very positive at 4.5, represents the sole area not achieving a perfect score.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a mixed picture. This institution excels in areas such as **professors**, achieving a strong 4 out of 5. It also demonstrates good standing in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring 3. Conversely, significant weaknesses are apparent with zero ratings for **facilities**, **location**, and **accommodation**. **Student life** received a low score of 1.
Overall, the university receives very positive feedback, with exceptional scores in value (5), professors (4.875), and internationality (4.875). Facilities and student life are also highly rated at 4.857. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 4.285, though still a solid rating. Location also scores well at 4.667.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
With high marks across the board, this university excels in faculty expertise, earning a near-perfect 4.67. Its location and accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.38. Student life, though strong at 4.22, represents the lowest-rated category in this assessment. Internationality and value for money are notably strong, both receiving 4.44.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting useful knowledge and good courses. A smaller portion (~8.3%) mentions poor organization and low-quality facilities.
Nearly all (99%) of the 94 reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, good academic explanations, and excellent extracurricular activities. A small amount of feedback (1%) mentioned a perceived focus on difficulty over quality.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight strong skills and knowledge acquisition, excellent teaching and research, and beneficial career prospects. Some noted the academic rigor and pressure.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting knowledgeable professors and a practical, in-depth curriculum. A smaller portion (~25%) reported issues with administrative processes.
All ten reviews are positive, with students praising the program's international environment and practical application of neuroscience to business. They highlight the valuable knowledge gained, career impact, and engaging classes.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback recommending the program. Students highlight great teachers, practical course content, and a supportive, diverse community as key strengths. There are no negative reviews.
I have completed my Marketing Degree at ESERP x Staffordshire program. It was useful, close to reality. The majority of professors were professional, except one who was constantly late for classes like 1 hour. After I complained about it, the situation got better, although my anonymity was not kept as it was promised, so do not believe that you can make anonymous complains - everything will be revealed.
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
I believe that this is an extremely global school, and it has been a tremendous experience interacting with a bunch of people from different nationalities. It has been an absolute pleasure to learn from some great names in the field. My only complaint would be in regard to the pressure the course invariably puts on the students. Even though Barcelona is a great city, it gets difficult when you are forced to the library 7 days a week. A work in progress would be my view on the programme!
My experience with Inesdi, a business school in Barcelona, was deeply discouraging. After requesting a refund of 200 euros for an unused service, I found myself trapped in a cycle of procrastination and evasion by the admissions manager. What should have been a simple process turned into an ordeal lasting almost three months, with no guarantee of receiving my money back. The lack of transparency and professionalism on the part of Inesdi is worrying. Instead of addressing my request promptly, they seemed more interested in prolonging the process, apparently to avoid fulfilling their obligation to refund the money. After weeks of frustration and multiple contact attempts, I was abruptly informed that my application was no longer eligible, with no clear explanation. In short, my experience with Inesdi was a total disappointment. Your lack of integrity and respect for clients demonstrates a lack of commitment to basic ethical standards. I recommend those considering enrolling at Inesdi to think twice, as it seems that their priority is not providing quality education or satisfactory customer service, but simply money.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
Nothing to show
