EAE Business School vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC vs Neuro Business School - NBS vs CodeOp
Side-by-side comparison from 208 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Expert tutors and practical, applicable knowledge
- +Comprehensive curriculum and flexible learning options
- +Excellent, dedicated faculty and personalized teaching
- +Vibrant campus environment and diverse extracurriculars
- +Strong academic support and flexible academic options
- +Flexible online learning model
- +Engaging virtual campus and resources
- +Supportive and accessible teaching staff
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- +Welcoming and safe community
- +Excellent instructors and support
- +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Supportive & engaged professors, humanistic & diverse environment
- +Practical learning, real-world application, and engaging classes
- +Accessible (affordable, online, evening classes) and helpful support
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -The quality of education is criticized for being superficial and not job-preparatory.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant concerns.
- -High failure rates and perceived unfair difficulty.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a concern.
- -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of structured instruction and feedback is a concern.
- -Unclear assessment criteria and disorganization cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Location**, achieving a score of 3.82. Conversely, its weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.07. Other aspects like Professor quality, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally consistent but not outstanding profile across the board.
Overall, this university garners solid ratings across various aspects. The strongest area is **Value**, achieving the highest score. Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Location** received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, indicating it's the weakest area. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality fall within a moderately positive range.
This institution shows notable strengths in **Location** (3.85) and **Internationality** (3.72), with **Professors** (3.64) and **Value** (3.68) also receiving positive marks. However, **Student Life** emerges as the weakest area at 2.58, alongside **Facilities** at 3.05. **Accomodation** falls in the middle ground with a rating of 3.12.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
This institution receives particularly high marks for **Internationality** (4.92) and **Location** (4.83), indicating a vibrant global presence and desirable setting. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score very well at 4.5. **Value** is rated as the comparatively weakest area at 4.25, though still a respectable score. Professors and student life also maintain strong ratings.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. Its value proposition is also very strong. However, accommodation presents the most significant weakness, rated considerably lower. Facilities also received a middling score.
Approximately 65% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable skills, multicultural environments, and expert tutors. A smaller portion, around 13%, expresses concerns regarding class depth and administrative responsiveness.
With a 4.03 average rating from 93 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students highlight helpful teachers, good explanations, and opportunities for social activities. A small amount of negative feedback exists.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the virtual campus, continuous assessment, and flexibility for work-life balance. A smaller portion of feedback notes issues with administrative errors and a lack of clear instruction or responsiveness.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
University students give very positive reviews, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars. They praise welcoming culture, excellent instructors, and effective job placement support. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
All reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, a humanistic and diverse approach, and a practical, affordable learning experience. The average rating is 4.67 out of 5.
I am deeply disappointed with my experience at EAE Business School. I regret wasting both my time and money on this institution, and I feel compelled to share my experience to help others avoid making the same mistake. First and foremost, it is evident that students' concerns and issues are not a priority for EAE. The administration's lack of response and follow-up on critical matters is appalling. I have had to chase them multiple times for essential documents, and even then, they failed to deliver. For instance, I needed an academic confirmation for my visa renewal. Despite my persistent efforts and numerous emails, I have yet to receive this crucial document. Their standard response is a simple "okay," but no real action is taken, leaving students in limbo. Academically, the situation is equally disheartening. Although I was enrolled in an English-taught program, I can confidently say that at least 90% of the professors lacked proficiency in English. Their inability to communicate effectively and convey the course material was a significant barrier to learning. Moreover, it seemed that many of the instructors lacked the necessary knowledge and expertise in their respective fields. It appears that the hiring standards at EAE do not prioritize the academic qualifications or language skills of their faculty, which severely undermines the quality of education provided. The overall environment at EAE feels more like a daycare center than a reputable business school. The lack of professionalism, coupled with inadequate academic support, makes it clear that the institution does not take the education of its students seriously. The administration's disregard for students' needs and the subpar teaching quality make it impossible to recommend this school to anyone. In conclusion, attending EAE Business School has been a colossal waste of time and money. If you value your time, money, and education, I strongly advise you to look elsewhere. Do not make the mistake of enrolling in this institution.
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
