University of Helsinki vs Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs University of Eastern Finland

Side-by-side comparison from 119 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK (4.90)
University of Helsinki: wins 1/7 categories
Tampere University - TUNI: wins 0/7 categories
Aalto University: wins 0/7 categories
South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK: wins 5/7 categories
University of Eastern Finland: wins 1/7 categories
University of Turku: wins 0/7 categories
Savonia University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Helsinki, Finland
4.30
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Botany
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Espoo, Finland
4.70
Read more reviews
35 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: BHC in Nursing
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.83
Win
4.57
4.40
4.78
4.33
4.25
Not rated
Location
4.42
3.90
4.06
4.61
Win
4.00
3.88
Not rated
Professors
4.54
4.17
4.11
4.91
Win
4.33
4.25
Not rated
Internationality
4.38
4.03
4.31
4.74
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.85
4.73
4.28
4.52
5.00
Win
3.71
Not rated
Value
4.46
4.20
4.37
4.74
Win
4.00
4.13
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
4.10
4.25
4.48
Win
4.33
3.88
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Top-tier research and teaching quality
  • +Supportive and accessible teachers and staff
  • +Balanced academic freedom with guidance and structure
  • +Strong academic programs and research focus
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
  • +Vibrant student community and campus life
  • +Independent learning, flexibility, and practical, hands-on experiences
  • +Strong sense of community, readily available support, and active student life
  • +Excellent facilities and multidisciplinary, diverse course opportunities
  • +Passionate and supportive educators
  • +Practical, career-focused, and well-structured programs
  • +International and friendly learning environment
  • +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
  • +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
  • +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
  • +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
  • +Welcoming city & positive student community
  • +Good accommodation & proximity to campus

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Concerns about teaching quality and university reforms.
  • -Administrative & management issues disrupt learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder progress.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a consistent complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
  • -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Facilities** (4.83) and **Student Life** (4.85). While **Location** (4.42), **Accomodation** (4.38), and **Internationality** (4.38) are strong, they represent the lower end of the provided ratings. Professors are well-regarded at 4.54, and value for money scores 4.46.

The university garners impressive scores across multiple facets, with Student Life and Facilities emerging as standout strengths, achieving ratings of 4.73 and 4.57 respectively. Professors and Value also received positive marks above 4.0. Location, however, is its weakest area, scoring 3.9, though accommodations and internationality remain solid at over 4.0.

This institution demonstrates a solid reputation across multiple facets. Areas like Facilities and Student Life received particularly high marks. Internationality and Value also stood out positively. While still strong, Professors were rated slightly lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for students.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Its Facilities and Internationality are also highly regarded, alongside a strong showing for Value. Conversely, Accomodation is rated slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly in areas directly related to learning and global engagement.

This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are highly positive (~78%), praising high-quality teaching, research, and student independence. The city and supportive environment are also frequently highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, approximately 96.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic environment, research focus, and facilities. A small percentage (~3.3%) of negative feedback notes a decline in teaching quality due to university reforms.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92%), with students praising flexible learning, excellent facilities, and active student life. A few reviewers mentioned that courses sometimes lack depth.

With all 25 reviews being positive, students praise supportive and passionate teachers, practical and career-focused programs, and a rewarding academic experience. An average rating of 4.88/5 reflects this strong satisfaction.

All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
44%
53%
54%
88%
67%
25%
0%
4★
44%
30%
40%
12%
33%
75%
0%
3★
11%
13%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student

Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!

My experience studying nursing at Xamk.

Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close