SKEMA Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs Nanjing University - NJU vs Nanjing University of Finance and Economics vs Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 160 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Practical, real-world teaching and international exposure
- +Supportive staff and engaging learning environment
- +High-quality programs and diverse student body
- +Excellent campus facilities and environment.
- +High teaching quality and strong academic reputation.
- +Diverse community and quality student accommodation.
Nothing to show
- +Accessible and supportive faculty
- +Engaging and practical curriculum
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Comfortable campus, good facilities, flexible curriculum
- +Skilled and experienced lecturers
- +Diverse programs and international community
- +Pleasant campus environment and events
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Irrelevant course content and unqualified instructors.
- -High tuition fees for perceived poor value.
- -Lack of student motivation and academic focus.
- -Lack of action regarding animal abuse by students.
- -Ethical concerns about the institution's values.
Nothing to show
- -Difficulty with instruction in Chinese
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative issues and lack of effective management create frustration.
- -Communication problems and unresponsiveness from staff are a recurring issue.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students find outdated facilities frustrating.
- -Students are unhappy with a lack of resources and support.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
This institution shows excellent strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving high scores of 4.15. **Professors** also garnered a perfect 4. **Facilities**, with a score of 3.54, and **Value** at 3.77, are respectable. The **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.31. **Internationality** is also a strong point, rated at 3.92.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest area. The **facilities** and **accommodation** also receive favorable ratings. Conversely, **internationality** is the lowest-rated aspect, with **professors** and **student life** receiving moderately lower scores than the university's stronger points. The **value** proposition is also rated well.
Nothing to show
This institution excels significantly in its internationality, receiving a perfect score. Accommodation and location are also strong points, both earning four out of five. Conversely, the university's facilities are its weakest area, rated at a zero. Value for money is also a concern, with a score of two. Professor quality and student life are mid-range, each scoring three.
The university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance in several key areas. Facilities and location both received a perfect score of 5. Other aspects such as Professors, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also highly rated, averaging approximately 4.67. This indicates a well-rounded positive experience for students.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received perfect scores of five. This indicates a uniformly outstanding university experience where no single area significantly outshines others, nor are there any weaker points to note based on these ratings.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
Most reviews (around 70%) highlight practical teaching, an international environment, and good quality staff/students. A small percentage (about 7.7%) express dissatisfaction with course relevance and teacher quality.
With a 3.29 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good facilities, teaching quality, and campus reputation. Negative feedback (~28.6%) expresses concern regarding animal welfare.
Nothing to show
The single review provided is negative, rating the university at 2/5. The primary concern highlighted is the difficulty of Chinese studies, despite positive remarks about the school environment.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise comfortable campuses, complete facilities, flexible curriculum, skilled lecturers, and a conducive environment for learning and self-development, including for international students.
This university receives a highly positive reception, with 100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight a comfortable campus environment and engaging events like the February Orchid viewing Festival. The average rating is 4 out of 5 stars.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
As a person who is in higher education, I would never ever enroll in a school that allows and condemns a person, a psychopath, who abuses and torture animals, to enroll and study there. Shame on this school and shame on China. I would recommend to considering going to a school that values life; especially of the vulnerable and voiceless (animals)! Enroll in a school that uses their voice and does something to protect the vulnerable. Skip this school that stays quiet about an animal torturer and allows them to enroll.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Hohai University is a research institution, aimed at solving problems in the environment. It offers varied programs : water and hydrology, environmental science, materials science, computer science, MBA etc. It provides conducive environment for international students.
Nothing to show
