EU Business School vs Webster University Geneva vs INSEEC Business School vs Rushford Business School vs University of Business And International Studies Geneva - UBIS

Side-by-side comparison from 260 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Rushford Business School (4.80)
EU Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Webster University Geneva: wins 0/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Rushford Business School: wins 3/6 categories
University of Business And International Studies Geneva - UBIS: wins 0/6 categories
IPAC: wins 2/6 categories
Geneva School of Diplomacy - GSD: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.80
Read more reviews
220 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Geneva, Switzerland
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Chambery, France
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: BBA International Business
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.00
3.43
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.70
4.33
4.64
4.74
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
3.98
4.00
3.86
4.90
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Internationality
4.69
4.33
4.50
4.85
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
Student life
4.17
4.33
4.07
4.40
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
3.86
4.00
3.64
4.80
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Accommodation
3.48
4.33
2.50
4.74
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, industry-focused learning and expert professors
  • +Real-world application and out-of-class learning opportunities
  • +Vibrant international student community and campus life
  • +Diverse international environment and global network
  • +Small class sizes and individualized support
  • +Accessible campus with many clubs and leadership development programs
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Flexible study schedules and diverse themes
  • +High-quality faculty with global perspectives
  • +Relevant MBA programs for career advancement

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
  • +Expert faculty with international experience and industry connections.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Education quality is poor with outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Accreditation issues limit future opportunities.
  • -Excessive homework and difficult grading policies are often criticized.
  • -Students express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Lack of promised support and opportunities.
  • -Poor post-enrollment communication.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
  • -Administrative & management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
Rating summary
What students say

The university excels in its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.69), indicating a highly desirable and globally connected environment. **Student life** (4.17) also received a strong rating. The primary area for improvement lies in **accommodation** (3.48), which is the lowest-scoring category. Other aspects such as **facilities** (4.05), **professors** (3.98), and **value** (3.86) are rated moderately well.

This institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas include Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 4.33. Facilities and Professors are rated solidly at 4, while Value also stands at 4. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with a slight edge in student experience and external factors compared to its academic and physical resources.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution receives excellent marks, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area, earning a perfect 5. **Professors** also garner high praise at 4.9. **Student Life**, while still strong, is the relatively weakest aspect with a score of 4.4. The university demonstrates a solid all-around performance with high ratings in location, accommodation, internationality, and value.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in Student Life and Internationality, both achieving perfect scores. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accomodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. The sole area falling slightly below the top tier is Value, also rated at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.82/5, students highlight industry-expert professors and practical, real-world learning. Around 8% of feedback noted disorganization and basic curriculum.

All three reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students highlight the strong international environment, small class sizes, and the benefits of its Geneva location, with ~100% of feedback being positive.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising program flexibility, diverse themes, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions unfulfilled promises and poor communication.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight excellent professors with international experience who provide valuable networking opportunities for jobs and internships.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
33%
21%
90%
0%
0%
0%
4★
45%
67%
50%
5%
0%
50%
100%
3★
22%
0%
43%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
good

I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Experience with Rushford business school

I regret choosing Rushford Business School for my MBA. Despite detailed discussions and assurances from its president, Syed Tufail, none of the promised support or opportunities were delivered. Communication after enrollment was extremely poor, and the overall experience did not meet expectations. Sharing this to help others make informed decisions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close