Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N Tupolev vs Elbrus Coding Bootcamp

Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 1/4 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/4 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 0/4 categories
Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N Tupolev: wins 0/4 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/4 categories
Kazan State Medical University - KGMY: wins 0/4 categories
ENC Bessière National Business School Paris: wins 3/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.14
4.14
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
3.95
4.67
4.64
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.10
4.33
4.18
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.50
Win
4.18
4.39
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Student life
4.75
4.10
4.85
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.20
4.48
4.33
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.93
3.99
3.66
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +High-quality education and professional teachers
  • +Vibrant student life with diverse activities

Nothing to show

  • +Expert faculty & practical experience
  • +Abundant learning resources
  • +Competent, approachable teachers and strong student support
  • +Thorough exam preparation and focus on student success
  • +Pleasant campus facilities and good cafeteria
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course material is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often criticized.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

A well-rounded institution, this university achieves a perfect score in location, offering a significant advantage. While most aspects, including facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all garnered a solid 4 out of 5, no other areas reached the same peak rating. This indicates a consistently good experience with a particular highlight on its advantageous geographic positioning.

Nothing to show

This institution earns top marks in key areas. Professors and location receive perfect scores, alongside excellent value. Facilities and accommodation are also strong, with internationality also rated positively. The main area for improvement, according to these ratings, is student life, which received a moderate score.

Overall, this institution garners very positive feedback, excelling in key areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths. Its weakest area, internationality, scored a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. This suggests a well-rounded experience with room for growth in global engagement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good education quality and professional teachers, alongside enjoyable student life with many challenging activities, particularly in sports.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university receives a 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights excellent professors and valuable hospital connections. No negative reviews were submitted.

With a 5/5 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise competent teachers, good support, and excellent exam preparation. One minor drawback mentioned was a classroom annex.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
65%
44%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4★
50%
22%
44%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
13%
9%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close