University of Wroclaw - UWr vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs Lazarski University vs Kozminski University vs University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn - UWM
Side-by-side comparison from 288 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Enriching academic and personal development opportunities
- +Great student city atmosphere and global opportunities
- +Inspiring academic environment and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
- +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
- +Prestigious reputation and pathway to a successful career
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Expert professors with engaging teaching methods.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a comfortable learning atmosphere.
- +Strong real-world application of academics and vibrant student life.
- +High-quality teaching and helpful instructors
- +Attractive campus location and good amenities
- +Welcoming environment for international students
- +Supportive and welcoming academic environment.
- +Diverse student body and cultural exchange.
- +Good facilities and accessible education.
- +Friendly atmosphere and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized, practical classes and good support
- +Clear communication and comfortable learning environment
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are evident.
- -Course content and program structure are not suitable for all students.
- -Limited career opportunities beyond specific fields are a concern.
- -Bureaucracy and administrative issues
- -Lack of support and usability from online systems
- -Overbearing control over student organizations
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration, with a lack of clear communication and support.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources for learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient individual attention from instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Poor quality of teaching and outdated curriculum.
- -Issues with lecturer's English proficiency.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Location**, earning a top rating. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect, though still a respectable score. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a generally positive range.
This university demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.67. **Professors** and **Value** also perform well, scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.58. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all fall within a comparable, solid range, generally above 4.0.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
With a strong showing in most areas, this university excels particularly in its **professors** and **internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.57. **Facilities** also received a high mark at 4.5. The **location**, however, represents the lowest-rated aspect at 4.06, while other categories like student life, accommodation, and value fall within a good to excellent range.
This institution excels in student experience, boasting perfect scores for both Location and Student Life. Accommodations and Internationality also received high marks, around 4.25 to 4.5. The lowest-rated area is Professors, with a score of 3.75, though this still represents a solid performance. Overall, the university presents a highly attractive offering, particularly regarding its environment and student support.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance across various aspects. The strongest areas are Location, receiving a perfect score, and Internationality, which is highly rated. Conversely, Accomodation is the weakest point, with a significantly lower score compared to other categories. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are all rated moderately well, indicating areas of general satisfaction.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across most aspects, achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Accommodations are rated slightly lower but still very positively at 4. Overall, it presents a highly desirable and well-rounded university experience, with its primary area for potential improvement being student housing.
With ~83% of 67 reviews being positive, students praise helpful lecturers, great atmosphere, and academic/personal growth opportunities. A small ~4.5% of negative feedback mentions disappointing course relevance and limited opportunities.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, praising the inspiring community, academic rigor, and dedicated faculty. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with bureaucracy and administrative processes.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
Nearly all ~94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, modern facilities, and vibrant campus life. A very small percentage of feedback noted no significant issues.
All four reviews are positive, rating the university highly. Recurring themes include the high quality of teaching and helpful professors, as well as the attractive campus location with good amenities and an international atmosphere.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive academics, a welcoming atmosphere, and diversity. Around 12.5% of feedback expresses concerns regarding curriculum adherence and lecturer English proficiency.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a friendly atmosphere, approachable lecturers, and well-organized, practical classes. The student experienced good support, clear communication, and a comfortable learning environment.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
Nothing to show
