emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Nanjing University - NJU vs Nanjing University of Finance and Economics vs Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 219 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Strong academic programs with practical, career-focused learning
- +Diverse, international student environment and collaborative experiences
- +Excellent professional opportunities and supportive career services
- +Excellent campus facilities and environment.
- +High teaching quality and strong academic reputation.
- +Diverse community and quality student accommodation.
Nothing to show
- +Accessible and supportive faculty
- +Engaging and practical curriculum
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Comfortable campus, good facilities, flexible curriculum
- +Skilled and experienced lecturers
- +Diverse programs and international community
- +Pleasant campus environment and events
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Faculty and teaching quality are criticized for prioritizing profit over education and lacking effective guidance.
- -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create difficulty in tracking deadlines and managing studies.
- -Lack of action regarding animal abuse by students.
- -Ethical concerns about the institution's values.
Nothing to show
- -Difficulty with instruction in Chinese
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative issues and lack of effective management create frustration.
- -Communication problems and unresponsiveness from staff are a recurring issue.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students find outdated facilities frustrating.
- -Students are unhappy with a lack of resources and support.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This university garners commendable ratings across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving an impressive 4.39. Location and facilities also score highly, around 4.24 and 4.23 respectively. Student life and value are rated favorably at 4.14 and 4.05. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.59.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest area. The **facilities** and **accommodation** also receive favorable ratings. Conversely, **internationality** is the lowest-rated aspect, with **professors** and **student life** receiving moderately lower scores than the university's stronger points. The **value** proposition is also rated well.
Nothing to show
This institution excels significantly in its internationality, receiving a perfect score. Accommodation and location are also strong points, both earning four out of five. Conversely, the university's facilities are its weakest area, rated at a zero. Value for money is also a concern, with a score of two. Professor quality and student life are mid-range, each scoring three.
The university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance in several key areas. Facilities and location both received a perfect score of 5. Other aspects such as Professors, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also highly rated, averaging approximately 4.67. This indicates a well-rounded positive experience for students.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received perfect scores of five. This indicates a uniformly outstanding university experience where no single area significantly outshines others, nor are there any weaker points to note based on these ratings.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With a 4.35/5 average rating from 156 reviews, ~87% praised diverse subjects, practical skills, international diversity, and career support. A small minority (~2.6%) cited poor management, communication, and disorganization.
With a 3.29 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good facilities, teaching quality, and campus reputation. Negative feedback (~28.6%) expresses concern regarding animal welfare.
Nothing to show
The single review provided is negative, rating the university at 2/5. The primary concern highlighted is the difficulty of Chinese studies, despite positive remarks about the school environment.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise comfortable campuses, complete facilities, flexible curriculum, skilled lecturers, and a conducive environment for learning and self-development, including for international students.
This university receives a highly positive reception, with 100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight a comfortable campus environment and engaging events like the February Orchid viewing Festival. The average rating is 4 out of 5 stars.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
As a person who is in higher education, I would never ever enroll in a school that allows and condemns a person, a psychopath, who abuses and torture animals, to enroll and study there. Shame on this school and shame on China. I would recommend to considering going to a school that values life; especially of the vulnerable and voiceless (animals)! Enroll in a school that uses their voice and does something to protect the vulnerable. Skip this school that stays quiet about an animal torturer and allows them to enroll.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Hohai University is a research institution, aimed at solving problems in the environment. It offers varied programs : water and hydrology, environmental science, materials science, computer science, MBA etc. It provides conducive environment for international students.
Nothing to show
