Vrije Universiteit Brussel - VUB vs EIT Digital Master School vs Vlerick Business School vs Institut des hautes études des communications sociales - IHEC vs Vesalius College Brussels - VeCo
Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging discussions through diversity and expert, passionate lecturers
- +Supportive learning environment with ample student interaction and academic development
- +Rich campus atmosphere and promising career prospects
Nothing to show
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Strong practical and professional focus
- +High quality, relevant course content and diverse specializations
- +Connection to the professional world and competent instructors
- +Accessible and supportive instructors
- +Engaging and well-structured courses
- +Strong career services and graduate support
- +High-quality, practical courses and supportive professors
- +International outlook and diverse student body
- +Numerous travel and internship opportunities
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Discrimination and lack of support from university administration when addressing issues.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lectures, coupled with excessively difficult exams.
- -Lack of practical elements in the curriculum and insufficient individual student attention.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -administrative and management issues
- -lack of transparency and limited support
- -a disconnect between advertised quality and actual experience
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized for being ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Emerging from the data, the university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.38), suggesting a globally connected campus. Solid performance is also evident in **Facilities** (3.98), **Location** (3.96), and **Value** (3.96). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.62) and **Accomodation** (3.51) present areas for potential improvement. Overall, it showcases a good balance with a distinct international strength.
Nothing to show
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
This institution presents a generally positive profile. Its strongest aspects are the **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3. The university also scores a respectable 3.5 in **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a solid, well-rounded experience.
This university received uniformly average ratings of 1 across all evaluated categories. There are no standout strengths or weaknesses, indicating a consistent level of performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The institution presents a balanced, albeit unremarkable, profile based on this assessment.
This university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.43) and **Value** (4.29), suggesting a strong global presence and perceived worth. **Professors** also receive a commendable rating (4.14). Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 3.43. **Student Life** (3.57) and **Accommodation** (3.71) fall in the mid-range, indicating a solid but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the green atmosphere, expert lecturers, and diverse environment. A small percentage (~8%) of negative feedback mentions issues with lecturer communication and exam difficulty.
Nothing to show
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
With 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's practical, professional focus and strong connection to the industry. They highlight hands-on learning, project-based work, and competent instructors.
Two reviews exist, both negative (1-2 stars) with an average rating of 1/5. Feedback highlights limited support, questionable transparency, and an internal culture needing improvement.
With a 4/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback, reviews highlight excellent education, attentive professors, and high-quality, applicable courses. Opportunities for travel and an international outlook are recurring positive themes.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
I really like the lush and green atomosphere surrounding the campus on Etterbeek. There is generally always a vivid and positive vibe on the campus. From all the campuses I have been, this one has the most greenery. A small downside however is that some aula's look a bit dated from the inside, yet this isn't much of an issue when it comes to my learning experiences.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
