Universidad Jesuita de Guadalajara - ITESO vs Universidad de Guadalajara - UDG vs Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey - ITESM vs Universidad de Especialidades - UNE

Side-by-side comparison from 129 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Especialidades - UNE (5.00)
Universidad Jesuita de Guadalajara - ITESO: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de Guadalajara - UDG: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del valle de México - UVM: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey - ITESM: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad de Especialidades - UNE: wins 1/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
ITESO, Universidad Jesuita de Gualadajara: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Digital Management
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Laboratory Technology
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.72
Win
3.60
4.15
4.59
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Location
3.80
4.30
4.31
4.57
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.32
3.64
4.47
4.48
5.00
Win
4.63
Not rated
Internationality
3.37
3.64
3.60
4.39
4.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.20
3.91
4.43
4.52
Win
4.00
3.88
Not rated
Value
3.80
4.27
3.87
4.35
Win
4.00
4.13
Not rated
Accommodation
3.73
3.22
3.50
4.24
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and engaging learning environments
  • +Vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Beautiful campus and excellent facilities
  • +Highly regarded academic reputation and quality lecturers
  • +Excellent medical program and experienced doctors
  • +Extensive university facilities and vibrant student life
  • +Accessible education via scholarships
  • +Engaging professors and diverse academic offerings
  • +Extracurricular activities and community involvement
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Diverse extracurricular activities and opportunities
  • +High academic standards and real-world project focus
  • +Quality education and professional development
  • +Preparation for real-world challenges
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and support create a negative student experience.
  • -Persistent, intrusive recruitment calls.
  • -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels.
  • -Lack of student support and unresponsive administration
  • -Poor faculty engagement and effort
  • -Failure to address student safety concerns
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and confusion.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support create a negative experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional ratings for its facilities, scoring a high 4.72. Professors also receive strong marks at 4.32, closely followed by student life at 4.2. The university's weakest areas include internationality, with a score of 3.37, and accommodation at 3.73. Location and value are rated moderately at 3.8.

This institution achieves its highest marks for Location and Value. Areas requiring more attention include Accommodations and Facilities, which received lower scores. Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately well, with Professors also falling into this mid-range.

Academic strengths emerge clearly, with Professors and Student Life receiving the highest marks. Facilities and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Value for money falls in the middle of the spectrum.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive profile. Facilities and location are standout areas, both scoring over 4.5. Student life and professors also received strong marks. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Internationality and value for money are rated moderately well, falling between the highest and lowest scores.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile with consistently high ratings. Its strongest area is clearly the quality of its professors, who received a perfect score. All other assessed aspects, including facilities, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, are rated a solid 4 out of 5, indicating a very good performance across the board.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most feedback is positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, a supportive community, and enriching extracurricular activities. Students also praise the beautiful campus and modern facilities.

With a 4/5 average rating from 17 reviews, ~71% are positive. Students praise excellent teachers, high academic standing, and extensive facilities. Some mention scheduling issues and limited program depth.

Around 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting good resources and engaging professors. The average rating is 3.71/5, with minimal negative feedback.

~98.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting great classes, supportive professors, and personal growth opportunities. A single negative review expressed concerns about student care and safety issues.

With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, this university is highly praised. Reviews highlight its crucial role in training professionals dedicated to national development and preparing generations for the working world.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
29%
29%
68%
100%
63%
0%
4★
29%
41%
25%
26%
0%
38%
0%
3★
14%
29%
38%
4%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
4%
1%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Acquire the knowledge you need at your pace

The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.

New and modern teaching methods

ITESM is a college that greatly values student development in every aspect of their lives, from a deep and personal level up to the professional aspect of the University. The courses and classes have a modern way of teaching students different lessons and subjects in easy, fast and innovative ways in order to acquire as much information as possible, leaving space at the end of the career path to get a more deep and concentrated approach to the field of studies you wish to focus on. To finish it up there are hundreds of opportunities and activities to develop your personal self and your social abilities and connections; the School truly values the sense of entrepreneurship and social responsibility, among other core values, and it makes an effort to really make students feel like part of the TEC community through the years.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close