Romanian-American University vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty vs Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Romanian-American University: wins 0/1 categories
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC: wins 0/1 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/1 categories
Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty: wins 1/1 categories
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi: wins 0/1 categories
Faculty of Computer Science - Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi: wins 0/1 categories
Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iaşi - TUIASI: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
3.88
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
3.82
4.21
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.15
3.99
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.33
3.58
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Student life
3.97
4.27
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
3.98
4.09
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Accommodation
3.82
3.97
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty
  • +Valuable practical experiences and learning opportunities
  • +Affordable living costs and good facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong technical training and faculty advantages

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and faculty
  • +Positive and pleasant study experience
  • +Strong technical foundation and practical skills development
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Interactive and interesting courses
Cons
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and poor future preparation.
  • -Arrogant academic staff and poor student treatment.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic success.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause frustration for students.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as rigid and not aligned with industry needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

This university garners particularly strong ratings in **Student Life** and **Location**, both exceeding 4.2. **Value** and **Accomodation** also score highly, around 4.0. In contrast, **Internationality** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.58, while **Facilities** also falls slightly below other metrics at 3.88. Professors are generally well-regarded, nearing a 4.0 average.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves near-perfect scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The only slight deviation is in student life, which receives a very good score of 4. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its core offerings and environment, with student life being its most comparatively lower, yet still positive, aspect.

Nothing to show

This institution excels, securing perfect scores in **Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value**. Accommodations and Facilities also received strong marks at 4 out of 5. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high-quality experience, with its strongest aspects lying in its academic staff, vibrant campus, and affordability. Its weakest areas, though still highly rated, are its physical infrastructure and housing options.

This institution achieves excellent scores across most aspects. Its strongest areas are Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all earning a perfect 5. Internationality and Value also stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated a solid 4, representing the slightly less outstanding, though still positive, performance areas within this comprehensive evaluation.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

With an average rating of 4.05/5 from 19 reviews, approximately 74% are positive, highlighting good facilities and involved teachers. A small portion (~5.3%) experienced disappointment with teaching methods and arrogant staff.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights the electrical engineering faculty's strong professional and educational advantages, particularly in energy field technical training.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback highlights great professors in the Faculty of Computer Science who support students. There is no negative feedback to report.

Based on two reviews, the university has a 100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a strong technical foundation, practical skills development, and passionate, knowledgeable professors. Courses are described as interactive and interesting.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
37%
0%
100%
0%
100%
50%
4★
33%
37%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
0%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
17%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close