Universidad de Huelva vs University of Ljubljana vs University of Ljubljana Faculty of Computer and Information Science vs NTF-Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering vs IEDC-Bled School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Welcoming and accessible environment
- +Attentive and close teaching staff
- +Good facilities and resources
- +Challenging and interdisciplinary programs
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Welcoming environment and personal development opportunities
- +Approachable and skilled professors with interesting and relevant courses.
- +Modern facilities and flexible curriculum allowing student choice.
- +Good balance of theory and practical learning with organized student activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable professors
- +Well-structured classes and hands-on labs
- +Modern campus with great facilities
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities for sports and general use.
- -Poor teaching quality due to language barriers and ineffective delivery.
- -Lack of basic amenities like heating and inadequate organizational structure.
- -Communication and transparency issues
- -Lack of challenging assignments and exams
- -Limited social interaction between faculties
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -The cost of attendance is perceived as too high for the value received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
This institution demonstrates a solid average across several aspects, with its strongest area being **Professors**, earning a respectable 3.75. Areas such as Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality represent the weakest points, all receiving a rating of 3. Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a middle tier, indicating moderate satisfaction.
Student feedback indicates a well-rounded university experience, with **Location** and **Student Life** receiving the highest marks. Professors also earned strong praise. Conversely, **Internationality** was rated the lowest among the surveyed aspects, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Other areas like Facilities, Accommodation, and Value were rated moderately well.
This institution excels in its facilities, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Student life and value for money are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.33. Conversely, the university's internationality received the lowest marks at 3.67, with location also appearing as a comparatively weaker area at 3.83. Professors and accommodation were rated moderately at 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Value** and **Professors**. Facilities and student life also score well. Accommodation represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, indicating potential areas for improvement in student housing options. Internationality and facilities are rated favorably at 4.
About 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere, good services, and attentive staff. Around 25% of feedback mentioned poor facilities and organization issues. The average rating is 3.5/5.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~94% praise academically challenging programs, interdisciplinary collaboration, and supportive professors. One review found assignments and exams unchallenging.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of 6 reviews), with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise modern facilities, skilled and approachable professors, and relevant, balanced courses. Some note a high workload.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review for the Veterinary Medicine program is overwhelmingly positive (100%), with a 4/5 average rating. Strengths highlighted include knowledgeable professors, well-structured classes, engaging lab sessions, modern facilities, and a student-friendly city.
My experience as an Erasmus student was not that good. Starting from the teachers, they are supposed to teach in English but they just don't know the language very well, that is why the performance is poor as well as what arrives to the student in terms of study content. To follow with the complete lack of heating system in all the buildings except for the library (where the people who don't use laptops like to occupy the only few spots with sockets). The organization is very poor, it will very often happen that a communication of a canceled class will not be done, having you waking up early in the morning to find out there was not class that day, not to count that 1 hour and half spent on the bus to go and come back from the university (if you live in La Merced and don't have a bike, which would easily get stolen after 2 days after the purchase).
The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
